Family literacy and nutrition outcomes of the pilot Books & Cooks family education program

Literacy and food security are co-occurring public health issues that disproportionately affect families with low income. Children who struggle with literacy and who come from households that experience food insecurity are less likely to achieve academic success and are more likely to experience health issues later in life. Books & Cooks is a brief, theory-based, family education intervention that addresses literacy and food security by providing educational programming, grade-appropriate nutrition-themed books, cooking demonstrations, and home-delivered meal kits. Program components and evaluation measures were selected using the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The Books & Cooks pilot pre/post study included 75 families from households with low income, where most adult participants were Female (70, 93%), White (43, 57%), not Hispanic (61, 81%), married (27, 37%), and between the ages of 30 and 39 (40, 53%). Child participants were in kindergarten (13, 12%), first grade (25, 23%), second grade (21, 19%), third grade (21, 19%), fourth grade (16, 15%), and fifth grade (14, 13%). Over the course of this pilot intervention, participants reported positive changes across all SCT constructs, with environmental components showing the most consistent gains. Environmental outcomes that improved include the home literacy environment (p = 0.001), parental resources for reading (p < 0.001), food security status (p = 0.002), and nutrition security (p < 0.001). These results suggest that addressing environmental components may be most feasible from a programming perspective and most beneficial to families, since environmental barriers may prevent families from engaging in certain healthy behaviors. Furthermore, these results suggest that interdisciplinary programs may achieve promising results in our specific context, ultimately providing benefits to families in need.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-01655-1
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family literacy and nutrition outcomes of the pilot Books & Cooks family education program

A. Loren Mathews, Alicia Papanek, Karla P. Shelnutt, Miranda Badolato et al.
Discover Public Health
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Family literacy and nutrition outcomes of the pilot Books & Cooks family education program

A. Loren Mathews, Alicia Papanek, Karla P. Shelnutt, Miranda Badolato, David C. Diehl, Jeneé C. Duncan
article en

Abstract

Literacy and food security are co-occurring public health issues that disproportionately affect families with low income. Children who struggle with literacy and who come from households that experience food insecurity are less likely to achieve academic success and are more likely to experience health issues later in life. Books & Cooks is a brief, theory-based, family education intervention that addresses literacy and food security by providing educational programming, grade-appropriate nutrition-themed books, cooking demonstrations, and home-delivered meal kits. Program components and evaluation measures were selected using the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The Books & Cooks pilot pre/post study included 75 families from households with low income, where most adult participants were Female (70, 93%), White (43, 57%), not Hispanic (61, 81%), married (27, 37%), and between the ages of 30 and 39 (40, 53%). Child participants were in kindergarten (13, 12%), first grade (25, 23%), second grade (21, 19%), third grade (21, 19%), fourth grade (16, 15%), and fifth grade (14, 13%). Over the course of this pilot intervention, participants reported positive changes across all SCT constructs, with environmental components showing the most consistent gains. Environmental outcomes that improved include the home literacy environment (p = 0.001), parental resources for reading (p < 0.001), food security status (p = 0.002), and nutrition security (p < 0.001). These results suggest that addressing environmental components may be most feasible from a programming perspective and most beneficial to families, since environmental barriers may prevent families from engaging in certain healthy behaviors. Furthermore, these results suggest that interdisciplinary programs may achieve promising results in our specific context, ultimately providing benefits to families in need.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
University of Florida (US)
National Water Research Institute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.