A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Knowledge Management for Sustainable Innovation

HRMARS - Purpose: To examine the relationship between knowledge management (KM) and sustainable innovation by mapping the intellectual structure of the field. Methodology: A bibliometric and science-mapping study of 314 publications from the Web of Science (snapshot: October 2025), using VOSviewer co-occurrence, overlay, and density visualizations. Findings: Scholarly output has grown continuously since 2016, peaking during 2020–2025. A small set of highly cited authors leads the field. Core outlets include Sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, and Business Strategy and the Environment. Geographically, Asia—driven by China—leads productivity, followed by Europe. Keyword maps identify green innovation and knowledge management as central hubs, with emerging themes in AI, digital transformation, and dynamic capabilities. Overall, KMSI has matured into a multilevel domain linking managerial, environmental, and technological perspectives. Research limitations: 1.Reliance on a one-off WoS snapshot introduces coverage and recency biases that can distort publication trends, rankings, and keyword structures. 2.Co-occurrence and citation maps reflect associations rather than causation—and may be confounded by common shocks or omitted variable

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v15-i1/27913
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Knowledge Management for Sustainable Innovation

Zhang Naiheng, Ng Wei Chien, Xubin ., Teh Sin Yin
International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Knowledge Management for Sustainable Innovation

Zhang Naiheng, Ng Wei Chien, Xubin ., Teh Sin Yin
article en

Abstract

HRMARS - Purpose: To examine the relationship between knowledge management (KM) and sustainable innovation by mapping the intellectual structure of the field. Methodology: A bibliometric and science-mapping study of 314 publications from the Web of Science (snapshot: October 2025), using VOSviewer co-occurrence, overlay, and density visualizations. Findings: Scholarly output has grown continuously since 2016, peaking during 2020–2025. A small set of highly cited authors leads the field. Core outlets include Sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, and Business Strategy and the Environment. Geographically, Asia—driven by China—leads productivity, followed by Europe. Keyword maps identify green innovation and knowledge management as central hubs, with emerging themes in AI, digital transformation, and dynamic capabilities. Overall, KMSI has matured into a multilevel domain linking managerial, environmental, and technological perspectives. Research limitations: 1.Reliance on a one-off WoS snapshot introduces coverage and recency biases that can distort publication trends, rankings, and keyword structures. 2.Co-occurrence and citation maps reflect associations rather than causation—and may be confounded by common shocks or omitted variable

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management SciencesVol. 15(1)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.