Firm-government social exchange: Are venture firms more charitable after receiving government subsidy?

Research has suggested that firms in emerging economies often engage in philanthropy to secure political legitimacy. A natural follow-up question is whether a firm becomes less charitable after it gains political legitimacy. We draw on the social exchange perspective to posit that firms gaining greater political legitimacy, as indicated by the amount of government subsidy they received, tend to donate more to pay back the favour. In addition, this effect becomes stronger when the leadership in either the firms or local government changes, but such positive moderation effects become weaker when the leadership in both parties changes in the same year. Analysing a sample of venture firms publicly listed on China’s Growth Enterprises Market board from 2009 to 2017, we found support for the ideas. • Firms gaining greater amount of government subsidies tend to donate more to pay back the favour. • Venture firms tend to donate more to maintain social exchange relationship with local governments. • Social exchange relationship is bounded by leadership changes both in firms and local governments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Economic Review
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2026.102685
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firm-government social exchange: Are venture firms more charitable after receiving government subsidy?

W. Li, Liang Wen, Wei Liu, Jing Yu Yang
China Economic Review
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Firm-government social exchange: Are venture firms more charitable after receiving government subsidy?

W. Li, Liang Wen, Wei Liu, Jing Yu Yang
article en

Abstract

Research has suggested that firms in emerging economies often engage in philanthropy to secure political legitimacy. A natural follow-up question is whether a firm becomes less charitable after it gains political legitimacy. We draw on the social exchange perspective to posit that firms gaining greater political legitimacy, as indicated by the amount of government subsidy they received, tend to donate more to pay back the favour. In addition, this effect becomes stronger when the leadership in either the firms or local government changes, but such positive moderation effects become weaker when the leadership in both parties changes in the same year. Analysing a sample of venture firms publicly listed on China’s Growth Enterprises Market board from 2009 to 2017, we found support for the ideas. • Firms gaining greater amount of government subsidies tend to donate more to pay back the favour. • Venture firms tend to donate more to maintain social exchange relationship with local governments. • Social exchange relationship is bounded by leadership changes both in firms and local governments.

China Economic ReviewVol. 97
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.