Synthetic Ethical Reasoning (SER): A Framework for Computational Ethics in Autonomous Systems

This research on Synthetic Ethical Reasoning (SER) establishes a comprehensive theoretical and computational foundation for creating artificial systems capable of sound ethical decision-making that is both transparent and contextually adaptive. Unlike fragmented approaches that isolate symbolic logic from machine learning, SER introduces a hybrid cognitive framework enabling a dynamic balance between rigid ethical principles and the flexibility required to navigate complex, unforeseen human situations. Grounded in deontic logic, decision theory, and reinforcement learning, SER integrates: An Ethical Knowledge Base (EKB):An explicit representational system encoding ethical principles (e.g., "do no harm," "maximize overall well-being") as first-order deontic logic formulas. This ensures that decisions are anchored to a clear, auditable ethical foundation. A Symbolic Reasoning Engine:A mechanism utilizing Answer Set Programming (ASP) to evaluate potential actions against the principles stored in the EKB, generating quantitative "compliance scores" that reflect the ethical implications of each possible choice. A Meta-Ethical Controller:A learning component (machine learning) that dynamically adjusts the weights of the ethical principles based on human feedback. This adaptive mechanism is what grants the system the ability to navigate cultural and contextual variations, learning the nuanced ethical preferences of different users or societies. Empirical simulations demonstrate that SER-enabled agents achieve up to 37% higher ethical alignment compared to static rule-based systems, while maintaining competitive task performance. Furthermore, its adaptive capability allows it to resolve complex moral dilemmas (such as trolley-problem variants) in a manner that more closely aligns with human judgments, effectively bridging the gap between artificial logic and human intuition. SER thus pioneers a new synthetic science of ethical reasoning—one that moves beyond rigid or "black box" models toward AI systems capable not only of moral reasoning, but also of justifying their decisions and adapting to the diverse ethical fabric of society.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19023419
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthetic Ethical Reasoning (SER): A Framework for Computational Ethics in Autonomous Systems

Mohamad Zahir
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Synthetic Ethical Reasoning (SER): A Framework for Computational Ethics in Autonomous Systems

Mohamad Zahir
article en

Abstract

This research on Synthetic Ethical Reasoning (SER) establishes a comprehensive theoretical and computational foundation for creating artificial systems capable of sound ethical decision-making that is both transparent and contextually adaptive. Unlike fragmented approaches that isolate symbolic logic from machine learning, SER introduces a hybrid cognitive framework enabling a dynamic balance between rigid ethical principles and the flexibility required to navigate complex, unforeseen human situations. Grounded in deontic logic, decision theory, and reinforcement learning, SER integrates: An Ethical Knowledge Base (EKB):An explicit representational system encoding ethical principles (e.g., "do no harm," "maximize overall well-being") as first-order deontic logic formulas. This ensures that decisions are anchored to a clear, auditable ethical foundation. A Symbolic Reasoning Engine:A mechanism utilizing Answer Set Programming (ASP) to evaluate potential actions against the principles stored in the EKB, generating quantitative "compliance scores" that reflect the ethical implications of each possible choice. A Meta-Ethical Controller:A learning component (machine learning) that dynamically adjusts the weights of the ethical principles based on human feedback. This adaptive mechanism is what grants the system the ability to navigate cultural and contextual variations, learning the nuanced ethical preferences of different users or societies. Empirical simulations demonstrate that SER-enabled agents achieve up to 37% higher ethical alignment compared to static rule-based systems, while maintaining competitive task performance. Furthermore, its adaptive capability allows it to resolve complex moral dilemmas (such as trolley-problem variants) in a manner that more closely aligns with human judgments, effectively bridging the gap between artificial logic and human intuition. SER thus pioneers a new synthetic science of ethical reasoning—one that moves beyond rigid or "black box" models toward AI systems capable not only of moral reasoning, but also of justifying their decisions and adapting to the diverse ethical fabric of society.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.