The economics of elusive methane diplomacy: forecasting 2030 emissions in China, India, and Russia

Reduction of anthropogenic methane emissions poses a substantial imperative in the context of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. However, due to the detrimental effects of methane reduction policies on economic growth, public finance, social stability, vulnerable rural communities and employment, countries do not show strong political will on this issue, producing negative externalities on a global scale. To tackle this, 160 countries, which account for 59% of the emissions, signed the Global Methane Pledge, promising to reduce their emissions by 30% by 2030 relative to their 2020 levels. However, China, India, and Russia—the first, third, and fourth largest emitters, respectively—did not join the commitment. This paper aims to estimate methane emissions for these countries and elucidate the economic factors impeding their mitigation. Using annual data from Climate Watch (1990-2022), we apply two univariate machine learning forecasting methods—Autometrics and XGBoost—to project emissions through 2030. Our baseline projections reveal that methane emissions for all three countries will continue to increase, totaling 2896 MtCO2e in 2030. Our 2030 estimates indicate that, collectively, methane emissions from these three countries will be 7.04% above 2020 levels. Fossil fuel trade relationships between these countries, low labor productivity, and social costs related to energy and employment are the main explanatory factors. Our findings highlight the significant gap between global commitments and the economic realities of the major emitters. Policy implications state the urgency of prioritizing energy-sector methane abatement as the least costly way of combatting global warming and advancing methane diplomacy to facilitate equitable technology transfer and coordination strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06920-x
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The economics of elusive methane diplomacy: forecasting 2030 emissions in China, India, and Russia

Jeyhun I. Mikayilov, Sarvar Gurbanov, Artsiom Talmachou
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

The economics of elusive methane diplomacy: forecasting 2030 emissions in China, India, and Russia

Jeyhun I. Mikayilov, Sarvar Gurbanov, Artsiom Talmachou
article en

Abstract

Reduction of anthropogenic methane emissions poses a substantial imperative in the context of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. However, due to the detrimental effects of methane reduction policies on economic growth, public finance, social stability, vulnerable rural communities and employment, countries do not show strong political will on this issue, producing negative externalities on a global scale. To tackle this, 160 countries, which account for 59% of the emissions, signed the Global Methane Pledge, promising to reduce their emissions by 30% by 2030 relative to their 2020 levels. However, China, India, and Russia—the first, third, and fourth largest emitters, respectively—did not join the commitment. This paper aims to estimate methane emissions for these countries and elucidate the economic factors impeding their mitigation. Using annual data from Climate Watch (1990-2022), we apply two univariate machine learning forecasting methods—Autometrics and XGBoost—to project emissions through 2030. Our baseline projections reveal that methane emissions for all three countries will continue to increase, totaling 2896 MtCO2e in 2030. Our 2030 estimates indicate that, collectively, methane emissions from these three countries will be 7.04% above 2020 levels. Fossil fuel trade relationships between these countries, low labor productivity, and social costs related to energy and employment are the main explanatory factors. Our findings highlight the significant gap between global commitments and the economic realities of the major emitters. Policy implications state the urgency of prioritizing energy-sector methane abatement as the least costly way of combatting global warming and advancing methane diplomacy to facilitate equitable technology transfer and coordination strategies.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Troy University (US), ADA University (AZ), King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (SA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.