To stay here is to suffer, to return home is to perish: Entangled Zimbabwean migrants, precarity, and the crisis of return in post-apartheid South Africa

Zimbabwean migrants in South Africa increasingly articulate a desire to “go back home,” yet few can enact return. This paper investigates why return persists as aspiration while remaining practically unreachable. Drawing on multi-sited qualitative material with Zimbabwean migrants across South African urban spaces, the paper shows how everyday life is organised by internal bordering (bureaucratic obstruction, street-level policing, workplace coercion, and housing exclusions) that renders migrants continually deportable even when deportation does not occur. This dispersed bordering regime is amplified by Afrophobic nationalist mobilisation, in which citizens, landlords, customers, and employers become informal border agents, transforming ordinary public space into a series of checkpoints. The cumulative effect is not only economic vulnerability but a deeper temporal violence: a rightless temporality in which planning collapses under expiring documents, discretionary enforcement, and the constant possibility of expulsion. Against this, migrants sustain “home” as an affective horizon and moral reference point yet describe return as materially unsafe and socially ruinous under Zimbabwe’s protracted economic and political crisis. The article’s central contribution is the concept of a crisis of return: a condition where return becomes simultaneously ethically necessary and practically unlivable, producing a durable state of suspension between abandonment and exclusion. Because this crisis is produced across borders, sending countries like Zimbabwe need durable solutions for rebuilding the political–economic foundations of dignified life at home (macroeconomic stability, livelihoods, credible public services, and political accountability), alongside host-state reforms that end the manufacturing of rightlessness through internal bordering. The paper advances debates on precarious citizenship, bordering within democracies, and the politics of waiting in contemporary Southern Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06943-4
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To stay here is to suffer, to return home is to perish: Entangled Zimbabwean migrants, precarity, and the crisis of return in post-apartheid South Africa

Johannes Bhanye
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

To stay here is to suffer, to return home is to perish: Entangled Zimbabwean migrants, precarity, and the crisis of return in post-apartheid South Africa

Johannes Bhanye
article en

Abstract

Zimbabwean migrants in South Africa increasingly articulate a desire to “go back home,” yet few can enact return. This paper investigates why return persists as aspiration while remaining practically unreachable. Drawing on multi-sited qualitative material with Zimbabwean migrants across South African urban spaces, the paper shows how everyday life is organised by internal bordering (bureaucratic obstruction, street-level policing, workplace coercion, and housing exclusions) that renders migrants continually deportable even when deportation does not occur. This dispersed bordering regime is amplified by Afrophobic nationalist mobilisation, in which citizens, landlords, customers, and employers become informal border agents, transforming ordinary public space into a series of checkpoints. The cumulative effect is not only economic vulnerability but a deeper temporal violence: a rightless temporality in which planning collapses under expiring documents, discretionary enforcement, and the constant possibility of expulsion. Against this, migrants sustain “home” as an affective horizon and moral reference point yet describe return as materially unsafe and socially ruinous under Zimbabwe’s protracted economic and political crisis. The article’s central contribution is the concept of a crisis of return: a condition where return becomes simultaneously ethically necessary and practically unlivable, producing a durable state of suspension between abandonment and exclusion. Because this crisis is produced across borders, sending countries like Zimbabwe need durable solutions for rebuilding the political–economic foundations of dignified life at home (macroeconomic stability, livelihoods, credible public services, and political accountability), alongside host-state reforms that end the manufacturing of rightlessness through internal bordering. The paper advances debates on precarious citizenship, bordering within democracies, and the politics of waiting in contemporary Southern Africa.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
University of Cape Town (ZA), South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (ZA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.