A systematic review of the impact of GenAI on learning performance, AI hallucinations, and problem-solving in computer science education

This systematic review synthesizes 64 empirical studies to examine how Generative AI (GenAI) shapes learning in Computer Science Education (CSE), particularly in programming, debugging, algorithmic reasoning, and computational problem-solving contexts. Grounded in Constructivist, Sociocultural, Cognitive Load, Adaptive Learning, and Metacognitive Learning theories, the review adopts an integrative perspective to analyze how GenAI-driven adaptivity, AI output qualities, hallucination dynamics, and cognitive–affective regulation influence learners’ interpretation, cognitive processing, and learning outcomes. Findings reveal a dual impact of GenAI in CSE. On the negative side, hallucinated or misleading outputs can increase extraneous cognitive load during programming and debugging and promote over-reliance on system-generated content. They may also perpetuate inequities due to limited access in low-resource settings or insufficient support for culturally and linguistically diverse learners. These effects can disrupt error detection, self-monitoring, and problem-solving, leading to impaired learning performance, and widened educational disparities. On the positive side, when embedded within structured, equitable, and pedagogically grounded environments, GenAI supports reflective programming practice by promoting self-monitoring, verification, and strategic adjustment, thereby enhancing problem-solving skills, engagement, and personalized learning outcomes. By framing learning performance, hallucination dynamics, and problem-solving as interconnected dimensions of GenAI-supported computing education, this review provides a theoretically coherent and pedagogically grounded lens for understanding how GenAI reshapes learning in CSE. The review’s novelty lies in its integrative conceptual framework, offering actionable insights for designing equitable, cognitively balanced, and instructionally effective GenAI-supported learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100570
Primary Topic
Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of the impact of GenAI on learning performance, AI hallucinations, and problem-solving in computer science education

Jarkko Suhonen, Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi, Adedeji Adefisoye Adejumo, Solomon Sunday Oyelere
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations
article

A systematic review of the impact of GenAI on learning performance, AI hallucinations, and problem-solving in computer science education

Jarkko Suhonen, Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi, Adedeji Adefisoye Adejumo, Solomon Sunday Oyelere
article en

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes 64 empirical studies to examine how Generative AI (GenAI) shapes learning in Computer Science Education (CSE), particularly in programming, debugging, algorithmic reasoning, and computational problem-solving contexts. Grounded in Constructivist, Sociocultural, Cognitive Load, Adaptive Learning, and Metacognitive Learning theories, the review adopts an integrative perspective to analyze how GenAI-driven adaptivity, AI output qualities, hallucination dynamics, and cognitive–affective regulation influence learners’ interpretation, cognitive processing, and learning outcomes. Findings reveal a dual impact of GenAI in CSE. On the negative side, hallucinated or misleading outputs can increase extraneous cognitive load during programming and debugging and promote over-reliance on system-generated content. They may also perpetuate inequities due to limited access in low-resource settings or insufficient support for culturally and linguistically diverse learners. These effects can disrupt error detection, self-monitoring, and problem-solving, leading to impaired learning performance, and widened educational disparities. On the positive side, when embedded within structured, equitable, and pedagogically grounded environments, GenAI supports reflective programming practice by promoting self-monitoring, verification, and strategic adjustment, thereby enhancing problem-solving skills, engagement, and personalized learning outcomes. By framing learning performance, hallucination dynamics, and problem-solving as interconnected dimensions of GenAI-supported computing education, this review provides a theoretically coherent and pedagogically grounded lens for understanding how GenAI reshapes learning in CSE. The review’s novelty lies in its integrative conceptual framework, offering actionable insights for designing equitable, cognitively balanced, and instructionally effective GenAI-supported learning environments.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 10
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Luleå University of Technology (SE), University of Exeter (GB), Modibbo Adama University of Technology (NG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.