Engram: Parameter Compression with Modulator Signals in Fixed-Capacity Continual Learning

Continual learning under a fixed parameter budget requires deciding which parametersshould be preserved and which can still be changed as new tasks arrive. Methods such asPackNet mainly rely on weight magnitude when selecting parameters, which can miss smallbut important parameters. We propose the Engram method, which uses modulator signalsconstructed from loss, logits, and gradients during ordinary training to identify importantparameters and uses phase swap to compress task-related information distributed across thebackbone into a selected parameter subset. In a setting where task information is given, wecompare Engram with PackNet and two variants that differ only in the selection score onP-MNIST and Split-MNIST under similar realized occupancy conditions. On P-MNIST,Engram achieves higher after10 mean accuracy, with the largest gain in the low-cap condition,reaching 81.98 versus 67.89 for PackNet at Uglob ≈ 0.0482. On high-cap Split-MNIST, allmethods reach nearly saturated accuracy. These gains require larger additional training-statememory and longer runtime, but under the same sparse export rule the increase in totaldeployment storage is relatively small at 5.7%

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19019080
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engram: Parameter Compression with Modulator Signals in Fixed-Capacity Continual Learning

Changhoon Lee
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

Engram: Parameter Compression with Modulator Signals in Fixed-Capacity Continual Learning

Changhoon Lee
article en

Abstract

Continual learning under a fixed parameter budget requires deciding which parametersshould be preserved and which can still be changed as new tasks arrive. Methods such asPackNet mainly rely on weight magnitude when selecting parameters, which can miss smallbut important parameters. We propose the Engram method, which uses modulator signalsconstructed from loss, logits, and gradients during ordinary training to identify importantparameters and uses phase swap to compress task-related information distributed across thebackbone into a selected parameter subset. In a setting where task information is given, wecompare Engram with PackNet and two variants that differ only in the selection score onP-MNIST and Split-MNIST under similar realized occupancy conditions. On P-MNIST,Engram achieves higher after10 mean accuracy, with the largest gain in the low-cap condition,reaching 81.98 versus 67.89 for PackNet at Uglob ≈ 0.0482. On high-cap Split-MNIST, allmethods reach nearly saturated accuracy. These gains require larger additional training-statememory and longer runtime, but under the same sparse export rule the increase in totaldeployment storage is relatively small at 5.7%

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.