Under-calcination thermal reactivation of hydrated cement pastes and construction and demolition waste: A comparison of different commercial products

This study explores the properties of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) obtained from the under-calcining thermal reactivation of construction and demolition waste fines (CDW) and of pure hydrated cement pastes (HCPs) derived from different commercial cements (CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, and CEM IV, classified according to EN 197-1). Samples were thermally treated at 350 °C (low-energy activation) and 600 °C (high-reactivity optimization) to increase pozzolanic and/or hydraulic behavior without inducing CO₂ release from calcination. Phase transformations were analyzed by X-ray Powder Diffraction with Rietveld refinement, thermal behavior by TGA/DTA, and morphological evolution by SEM, while reactivity and hydration kinetics were assessed using isothermal calorimetry. Results indicate pronounced differences in thermal response among the HCPs and CDW, governed by their specific phase assemblages and initial SCM content (limestone, slag, and pozzolans). At the selected under-calcining high-reactivity temperature (600 °C), γ-C₂S formation is favored. Thermal reactivation of slag-rich cement (CEM III) yielded the most reactive circular SCM, combining both high hydraulic (260 J/g - EN 196-11) and pozzolanic (329 J/g - ASTM C1897-20) performances with reduced carbon impacts. • Thermal reactivation of market available hydrated cement pastes and CDW is studied. • Effect of residual cement content on CDW reactivation is shown. • Treatments at 350 and 600 °C increased pozzolanic reactivity with low CO₂ emissions • Under-calcining reactivation at 600 °C formed γ-C₂S with high CO₂ capture potential. • Slag-rich HCP (CEM III) yielded the most reactive, circular SCM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e05978
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Under-calcination thermal reactivation of hydrated cement pastes and construction and demolition waste: A comparison of different commercial products

P. Šajna, G. Cruciani, A. Balbo, A. Neri et al.
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Under-calcination thermal reactivation of hydrated cement pastes and construction and demolition waste: A comparison of different commercial products

P. Šajna, G. Cruciani, A. Balbo, A. Neri, S. Castellini, S. Dolenec, A. Bisciotti
article en

Abstract

This study explores the properties of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) obtained from the under-calcining thermal reactivation of construction and demolition waste fines (CDW) and of pure hydrated cement pastes (HCPs) derived from different commercial cements (CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, and CEM IV, classified according to EN 197-1). Samples were thermally treated at 350 °C (low-energy activation) and 600 °C (high-reactivity optimization) to increase pozzolanic and/or hydraulic behavior without inducing CO₂ release from calcination. Phase transformations were analyzed by X-ray Powder Diffraction with Rietveld refinement, thermal behavior by TGA/DTA, and morphological evolution by SEM, while reactivity and hydration kinetics were assessed using isothermal calorimetry. Results indicate pronounced differences in thermal response among the HCPs and CDW, governed by their specific phase assemblages and initial SCM content (limestone, slag, and pozzolans). At the selected under-calcining high-reactivity temperature (600 °C), γ-C₂S formation is favored. Thermal reactivation of slag-rich cement (CEM III) yielded the most reactive circular SCM, combining both high hydraulic (260 J/g - EN 196-11) and pozzolanic (329 J/g - ASTM C1897-20) performances with reduced carbon impacts. • Thermal reactivation of market available hydrated cement pastes and CDW is studied. • Effect of residual cement content on CDW reactivation is shown. • Treatments at 350 and 600 °C increased pozzolanic reactivity with low CO₂ emissions • Under-calcining reactivation at 600 °C formed γ-C₂S with high CO₂ capture potential. • Slag-rich HCP (CEM III) yielded the most reactive, circular SCM.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 24
University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Ferrara (IT), Parco Tecnologico Padano (IT), Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute (SI)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.