Working together through the storm: The role of task performance in a collaborative emergent multiorganizational disaster response network

This work studies how the tasks performed by organizations responding to a large-scale disaster affects the structures and interactions within an emergent multiorganizational network (EMON) of collaborations. We formulate a large language model-based methodology for systematic extraction of organizational task structures from long-form situational reports detailing the activities of organizations responding to the 2005 Hurricane Katrina disaster. Tasks are related to a broader disaster response task ontology, then used in exploratory multivariate analysis augmented by nonparametric hypothesis tests to understand how the tasks performed by each organization relate to their collaborations and positions within the broader EMON structure. • Membership in the giant component of collaborations is associated with higher average levels of task performance. • High degree nodes, on average, perform larger numbers of tasks but some isolated nodes are very active in task performance. • Node position in the collaboration network and the types of tasks performed are associated. • Work on related tasks is positively associated with collaborative relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Networks
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2026.02.006
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working together through the storm: The role of task performance in a collaborative emergent multiorganizational disaster response network

Carter T. Butts, Sabrina Mai
Social Networks
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Working together through the storm: The role of task performance in a collaborative emergent multiorganizational disaster response network

Carter T. Butts, Sabrina Mai
article en

Abstract

This work studies how the tasks performed by organizations responding to a large-scale disaster affects the structures and interactions within an emergent multiorganizational network (EMON) of collaborations. We formulate a large language model-based methodology for systematic extraction of organizational task structures from long-form situational reports detailing the activities of organizations responding to the 2005 Hurricane Katrina disaster. Tasks are related to a broader disaster response task ontology, then used in exploratory multivariate analysis augmented by nonparametric hypothesis tests to understand how the tasks performed by each organization relate to their collaborations and positions within the broader EMON structure. • Membership in the giant component of collaborations is associated with higher average levels of task performance. • High degree nodes, on average, perform larger numbers of tasks but some isolated nodes are very active in task performance. • Node position in the collaboration network and the types of tasks performed are associated. • Work on related tasks is positively associated with collaborative relationships.

Social NetworksVol. 86
University of California, Irvine (US), Swedish Institute (SE), Irvine University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Working together through the storm: The role of task performance in a collaborative emergent multiorganizational disaster response network — Carter T. Butts, Sabrina Mai · Social Networks (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS