Religion, morals, and pornography: risk or resource? A U.S. census-matched study

Pornography use is common in the United States, and a subset of individuals develop problematic pornography use (PPU). Previous research often excluded abstainers, leading to potentially biased conclusions on the overall role of religion and moral beliefs in pornography research. This study tested whether religious identification and moral disapproval of pornography function as risk factors for PPU or resources for well-being when the full population is considered. We analyzed data from a census-matched sample of U.S. adults (n = 2,806), using correlations, group comparisons, and hierarchical regressions to examine associations of religious identification and moral disapproval of pornography with sexual, romantic, and general life satisfaction, and suicidality. When including pornography-abstainers in analyses, moral disapproval and Judeo-Christian religious identification were unassociated with PPU, but linked to higher sexual, romantic, and general life satisfaction, and less suicidality. In contrast, PPU and pornography frequency were linked to lower satisfaction and more suicidality. Expanding analyses on the general population reframes the role of religion and morality in pornography research. Findings suggest that religion and moral disapproval may serve as protective resources for well-being and mental health. Further studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addictive Behaviors
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2026.108669
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religion, morals, and pornography: risk or resource? A U.S. census-matched study

Jürgen Maes, Joshua B. Grubbs, Robin Engelhardt, Shane W. Kraus et al.
Addictive Behaviors
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

Religion, morals, and pornography: risk or resource? A U.S. census-matched study

Jürgen Maes, Joshua B. Grubbs, Robin Engelhardt, Shane W. Kraus, Juliette F.M. Desbuleux, Beáta Bőthe
article en

Abstract

Pornography use is common in the United States, and a subset of individuals develop problematic pornography use (PPU). Previous research often excluded abstainers, leading to potentially biased conclusions on the overall role of religion and moral beliefs in pornography research. This study tested whether religious identification and moral disapproval of pornography function as risk factors for PPU or resources for well-being when the full population is considered. We analyzed data from a census-matched sample of U.S. adults (n = 2,806), using correlations, group comparisons, and hierarchical regressions to examine associations of religious identification and moral disapproval of pornography with sexual, romantic, and general life satisfaction, and suicidality. When including pornography-abstainers in analyses, moral disapproval and Judeo-Christian religious identification were unassociated with PPU, but linked to higher sexual, romantic, and general life satisfaction, and less suicidality. In contrast, PPU and pornography frequency were linked to lower satisfaction and more suicidality. Expanding analyses on the general population reframes the role of religion and morality in pornography research. Findings suggest that religion and moral disapproval may serve as protective resources for well-being and mental health. Further studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Addictive BehaviorsVol. 178
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of New Mexico (US), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur les Enjeux Sociaux (FR), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.