Using the Key Components for Drug Courts as an Assessment Tool: An Australian Case Study

In this article, we use the 10 Key Components for Drug Courts (Components), to evaluate the performance of Australia’s newest adult drug court, the Australian Capital Territory Drug and Alcohol Sentencing List (DASL). We track DASL’s performance over the first 18 months of operation, finding that the program adhered quite well to the Components and slightly improved its performance over time, with room for development in several areas. We conclude by reflecting on the value of evaluating drug courts using multiperspective quantitative and qualitative data that measure adherence to the Components. This method of evaluation can help practitioners and policymakers identify where practice may diverge from the Components and thus undermine success, as well as helping to recognise innovative and contextually appropriate ways of implementing the Components. In order to promote continuous improvement in drug court practice, we suggest that drug courts regularly assess their performance against the Components, in addition to more traditional outcome-based measures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ANU Open Research (Australian National University)
Published
2025-03-19
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the Key Components for Drug Courts as an Assessment Tool: An Australian Case Study

Sophie Yates, Karen Gelb, Lorana Bartels
ANU Open Research (Australian National University)
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Using the Key Components for Drug Courts as an Assessment Tool: An Australian Case Study

Sophie Yates, Karen Gelb, Lorana Bartels
article en

Abstract

In this article, we use the 10 Key Components for Drug Courts (Components), to evaluate the performance of Australia’s newest adult drug court, the Australian Capital Territory Drug and Alcohol Sentencing List (DASL). We track DASL’s performance over the first 18 months of operation, finding that the program adhered quite well to the Components and slightly improved its performance over time, with room for development in several areas. We conclude by reflecting on the value of evaluating drug courts using multiperspective quantitative and qualitative data that measure adherence to the Components. This method of evaluation can help practitioners and policymakers identify where practice may diverge from the Components and thus undermine success, as well as helping to recognise innovative and contextually appropriate ways of implementing the Components. In order to promote continuous improvement in drug court practice, we suggest that drug courts regularly assess their performance against the Components, in addition to more traditional outcome-based measures.

ANU Open Research (Australian National University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.