Semantic Identity Compression: Exact Zero-Error Laws, Rate-Distortion, and Neurosymbolic Necessity

What happens when classical compression theory meets learned representations? We answer this question exactly for zero-error identity recovery when the decoder observes a fixed embedding: the central object is the collision-fiber geometry of the map π, and it alone controls all operational costs. Concretely, let A_π = maxᵤ|π⁻¹(u)| be the largest collision fiber. We prove a tight fixed-length converse L ≥ log₂A_π, give the exact finite-block scaling law and a pointwise adaptive budget ⌈log₂|π⁻¹(u)|⌉, and derive the rate‑distortion tradeoff including an explicit deterministic distortion floor when identity bits are withheld. These statements characterize precisely the residual ambiguity left by any non‑injective learned embedding. The applied payoff follows: because the residual ambiguity is structural (fiber‑based) rather than an artifact of representation format, symbolic identity mechanisms (handles, keys, pointers, nominal tags) are the canonical system-level way to pay that identity debt. All main results are machine‑checked in Lean 4; the formalization verifies correctness and demonstrates that the fiber‑geometry framework is sufficiently clean for full mechanization. 1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19010331
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semantic Identity Compression: Exact Zero-Error Laws, Rate-Distortion, and Neurosymbolic Necessity

Tristan Simas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

Semantic Identity Compression: Exact Zero-Error Laws, Rate-Distortion, and Neurosymbolic Necessity

Tristan Simas
article en

Abstract

What happens when classical compression theory meets learned representations? We answer this question exactly for zero-error identity recovery when the decoder observes a fixed embedding: the central object is the collision-fiber geometry of the map π, and it alone controls all operational costs. Concretely, let A_π = maxᵤ|π⁻¹(u)| be the largest collision fiber. We prove a tight fixed-length converse L ≥ log₂A_π, give the exact finite-block scaling law and a pointwise adaptive budget ⌈log₂|π⁻¹(u)|⌉, and derive the rate‑distortion tradeoff including an explicit deterministic distortion floor when identity bits are withheld. These statements characterize precisely the residual ambiguity left by any non‑injective learned embedding. The applied payoff follows: because the residual ambiguity is structural (fiber‑based) rather than an artifact of representation format, symbolic identity mechanisms (handles, keys, pointers, nominal tags) are the canonical system-level way to pay that identity debt. All main results are machine‑checked in Lean 4; the formalization verifies correctness and demonstrates that the fiber‑geometry framework is sufficiently clean for full mechanization. 1

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.