Surfactant-modified carbon fiber–epoxy composites: Interfacial control of mechanical performance

Interfacial load-transfer inefficiency between carbon fibers and epoxy matrices limits the mechanical reliability of carbon fiber–reinforced polymer composites. This study treats Triton X-100 surfactant concentration as a controlled interfacial design variable and evaluates its effect on the mechanical behavior of short carbon fiber–epoxy composites. Fibers were surface-modified at 1, 2, and 3 wt.% Triton X-100 and incorporated into compression-molded epoxy composites at ∼40% fiber volume fraction. Tensile and compressive properties were measured per ASTM D3039 and D695; wettability, surfactant uptake, void fraction, and fracture morphology were characterized by contact angle goniometry, gravimetric analysis, Archimedes densitometry (ASTM D792), and scanning electron microscopy. The 1 wt.% composite exhibited tensile strength of 116.00 MPa (∼40.3% above untreated: 82.67 MPa) and a comparable compressive strength gain, while elastic modulus remained constant at ∼2.0 GPa across all conditions. Gravimetric analysis confirmed monolayer adsorption at 1 wt.% and excess deposition at 2 wt.%, consistent with the observed mechanical optimum. SEM revealed reduced fiber pull-out (64 ± 9 μm to 22 ± 4 μm) and suppressed debonding in the optimally treated composite. Controlled surfactant treatment provides a scalable, non-destructive route to enhance interfacial efficiency and mechanical performance in short carbon fiber–epoxy systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composite Materials
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983261432464
Primary Topic
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surfactant-modified carbon fiber–epoxy composites: Interfacial control of mechanical performance

Amitkumar B. Salunkhe, Rohit Raghunath Ghadge, Parshant Kumar
Journal of Composite Materials
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
article

Surfactant-modified carbon fiber–epoxy composites: Interfacial control of mechanical performance

Amitkumar B. Salunkhe, Rohit Raghunath Ghadge, Parshant Kumar
article en

Abstract

Interfacial load-transfer inefficiency between carbon fibers and epoxy matrices limits the mechanical reliability of carbon fiber–reinforced polymer composites. This study treats Triton X-100 surfactant concentration as a controlled interfacial design variable and evaluates its effect on the mechanical behavior of short carbon fiber–epoxy composites. Fibers were surface-modified at 1, 2, and 3 wt.% Triton X-100 and incorporated into compression-molded epoxy composites at ∼40% fiber volume fraction. Tensile and compressive properties were measured per ASTM D3039 and D695; wettability, surfactant uptake, void fraction, and fracture morphology were characterized by contact angle goniometry, gravimetric analysis, Archimedes densitometry (ASTM D792), and scanning electron microscopy. The 1 wt.% composite exhibited tensile strength of 116.00 MPa (∼40.3% above untreated: 82.67 MPa) and a comparable compressive strength gain, while elastic modulus remained constant at ∼2.0 GPa across all conditions. Gravimetric analysis confirmed monolayer adsorption at 1 wt.% and excess deposition at 2 wt.%, consistent with the observed mechanical optimum. SEM revealed reduced fiber pull-out (64 ± 9 μm to 22 ± 4 μm) and suppressed debonding in the optimally treated composite. Controlled surfactant treatment provides a scalable, non-destructive route to enhance interfacial efficiency and mechanical performance in short carbon fiber–epoxy systems.

Journal of Composite Materials
MIT World Peace University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.