Multi-material direct ink writing and co-sintering of gadolinium oxide – zirconium oxide components

Methods for fabrication of multi-material or functionally graded ceramic composite architectures are of interest for numerous applications. However, conventional co-sintering of multi-material ceramic parts is a challenge because differences in the sintering behavior of the two materials leads to interfacial strain and, ultimately, component failure. Direct ink writing (DIW) is an extrusion-based additive manufacturing process that excels at multi-material printing because multiple extrusion nozzles can be installed on the same gantry system. Furthermore, the use of DIW as a method to fabricate multi-material ceramic green bodies offers an additional variable for controlling and potentially matching sintering kinetics in the slurry formulation used for two dissimilar feedstocks. In the work documented in this manuscript, we explored two strategies to successfully co-sinter multi-material ceramic oxides: slurry optimization to match sintering kinetics and material gradients to step from one material to another. This manuscript also quantifies the allowable mismatch that avoids part cracking in solid solution forming multi-material systems and discusses best strategies to reduce mismatch during co-sintering. Inks composed of gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) and zirconium oxide (ZrO2), a surrogate for uranium oxide (UO2), were thermally matched, which resulted in a sintering mismatch reduction of over 10%. It was found that ~1% mismatch is tolerable during debind cycles and that ~5% mismatch is manageable during sintering cycles after slurry formulations are optimized to match the sintering behavior. Use of continuous gradients is shown to reduce sintering mismatch, although geometric resolution may be lost due to solid solution formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Advanced Manufacturing
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44334-026-00073-0
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-material direct ink writing and co-sintering of gadolinium oxide – zirconium oxide components

Ercan Cakmak, Corson L. Cramer, Christian Petrie, Derek A. Haas et al.
npj Advanced Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Multi-material direct ink writing and co-sintering of gadolinium oxide – zirconium oxide components

Ercan Cakmak, Corson L. Cramer, Christian Petrie, Derek A. Haas, Beth L. Armstrong, Patrick L. Snarr, A. Nelson, Joseph J. Beaman, James G. Hemrick
article en

Abstract

Methods for fabrication of multi-material or functionally graded ceramic composite architectures are of interest for numerous applications. However, conventional co-sintering of multi-material ceramic parts is a challenge because differences in the sintering behavior of the two materials leads to interfacial strain and, ultimately, component failure. Direct ink writing (DIW) is an extrusion-based additive manufacturing process that excels at multi-material printing because multiple extrusion nozzles can be installed on the same gantry system. Furthermore, the use of DIW as a method to fabricate multi-material ceramic green bodies offers an additional variable for controlling and potentially matching sintering kinetics in the slurry formulation used for two dissimilar feedstocks. In the work documented in this manuscript, we explored two strategies to successfully co-sinter multi-material ceramic oxides: slurry optimization to match sintering kinetics and material gradients to step from one material to another. This manuscript also quantifies the allowable mismatch that avoids part cracking in solid solution forming multi-material systems and discusses best strategies to reduce mismatch during co-sintering. Inks composed of gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) and zirconium oxide (ZrO2), a surrogate for uranium oxide (UO2), were thermally matched, which resulted in a sintering mismatch reduction of over 10%. It was found that ~1% mismatch is tolerable during debind cycles and that ~5% mismatch is manageable during sintering cycles after slurry formulations are optimized to match the sintering behavior. Use of continuous gradients is shown to reduce sintering mismatch, although geometric resolution may be lost due to solid solution formation.

npj Advanced ManufacturingVol. 3(1)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Battelle, UT-Battelle, National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.