Emotional Susceptibility to Public Scrutiny and Vaccine Hesitancy: An Exploratory Experimental Analysis

Abstract This paper explores the understudied link between self-consciousness and vaccine scepticism, combining an experimental approach with causal forests to estimate individual treatment effects. Leveraging data from a laboratory experiment with Italian university students, we find that individuals who are more easily induced to self-conscious responses (e.g., feeling shame or embarrassment) in response to public scrutiny tend to hold stronger vaccine misbeliefs. Rather than identifying a causal effect of self-consciousness elicitation on vaccine attitudes, our results highlight a correlation between pre-treatment attitudes and susceptibility to self-conscious emotions. This suggests that studying targeted public health communication may be crucial, as more sceptical individuals could avoid discussing with health professionals or develop self-conscious emotions as a result of these interactions, further exacerbating their vaccine hesitancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Italian Economic Journal
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-026-00365-6
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional Susceptibility to Public Scrutiny and Vaccine Hesitancy: An Exploratory Experimental Analysis

Alice Dominici, Christine Alamaa
Italian Economic Journal
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Emotional Susceptibility to Public Scrutiny and Vaccine Hesitancy: An Exploratory Experimental Analysis

Alice Dominici, Christine Alamaa
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the understudied link between self-consciousness and vaccine scepticism, combining an experimental approach with causal forests to estimate individual treatment effects. Leveraging data from a laboratory experiment with Italian university students, we find that individuals who are more easily induced to self-conscious responses (e.g., feeling shame or embarrassment) in response to public scrutiny tend to hold stronger vaccine misbeliefs. Rather than identifying a causal effect of self-consciousness elicitation on vaccine attitudes, our results highlight a correlation between pre-treatment attitudes and susceptibility to self-conscious emotions. This suggests that studying targeted public health communication may be crucial, as more sceptical individuals could avoid discussing with health professionals or develop self-conscious emotions as a result of these interactions, further exacerbating their vaccine hesitancy.

Italian Economic Journal
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT), Stockholm University (SE), Swedish Institute (SE), Bocconi University (IT)
Università di Bologna
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.