How can school-based programmes improve physical and mental health outcomes in low-and-middle-income countries? An umbrella review and logic model

School-based programmes offer a promising approach for improving physical and mental health trajectories in low-and-middle-countries (LMICs). This umbrella review and logic model explores how and in which contexts these programmes are effective. A systematic search of electronic databases identified 20 systematic reviews (5 meta-analyses) on school based (SB) physical (n = 13; primary studies = 214) and mental (n = 7; primary studies = 120) health programmes across a range of low, lower-middle, and upper-middle income countries. Programmes included universal (all students), selective (e.g., high-risk students), and indicated (e.g., students with symptoms) approaches. Evidence was stronger for proximal (e.g., nutritional knowledge), and intermediate (e.g., dietary behaviour) outcomes than for distal (e.g., obesity reduction) outcomes, and there were some variations in outcome by geographical region. Evidence for combined physical and mental health programmes was scant, with limited overlap between the two types of programmes (i.e. some shared components and outcomes). Moderators of programme effectiveness included recipient (e.g., gender, age) and programme (e.g., longer duration, multi-component) characteristics, and inner (e.g., school resources, support for teachers) and outer (e.g., partnerships with Non-Governmental Organisations) settings. Cultural adaptations and implementation quality were highlighted as important (yet rarely fully reported) factors in ensuring programme sustainability and scaling-up. There is some supportive evidence for SB programmes in LMICs, though evidence for effectiveness varies by temporality of outcome and geographical location. This highlights the importance of considering implementation barriers across outcome trajectories and ensuring sufficient attention is given to cultural adaptations. Dual programmes combining balanced physical and mental health modules might offer promise for addressing the growing burden of non-communicable diseases in LMICs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychology Review
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102727
Primary Topic
School Health and Nursing Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can school-based programmes improve physical and mental health outcomes in low-and-middle-income countries? An umbrella review and logic model

Domenico Giacco, Isha Lohumi, Catherine Winsper, Olayinka Omigbodun et al.
Clinical Psychology Review
School Health and Nursing Education
article

How can school-based programmes improve physical and mental health outcomes in low-and-middle-income countries? An umbrella review and logic model

Domenico Giacco, Isha Lohumi, Catherine Winsper, Olayinka Omigbodun, RANGASWAMY THARA, Shiva Prakash Srinivasan, Jasmine Kalha, Sagar Jilka, Helena Tuomainen, Paul Gill, Usoro Udousoro Akpan, Dafne Moroni, Swaran P. Singh, Sanjana Goutham, Tolulope Bella-Awusah, Soumitra Pathare, J.S. Thakur, Srividya N. Iyer
article en

Abstract

School-based programmes offer a promising approach for improving physical and mental health trajectories in low-and-middle-countries (LMICs). This umbrella review and logic model explores how and in which contexts these programmes are effective. A systematic search of electronic databases identified 20 systematic reviews (5 meta-analyses) on school based (SB) physical (n = 13; primary studies = 214) and mental (n = 7; primary studies = 120) health programmes across a range of low, lower-middle, and upper-middle income countries. Programmes included universal (all students), selective (e.g., high-risk students), and indicated (e.g., students with symptoms) approaches. Evidence was stronger for proximal (e.g., nutritional knowledge), and intermediate (e.g., dietary behaviour) outcomes than for distal (e.g., obesity reduction) outcomes, and there were some variations in outcome by geographical region. Evidence for combined physical and mental health programmes was scant, with limited overlap between the two types of programmes (i.e. some shared components and outcomes). Moderators of programme effectiveness included recipient (e.g., gender, age) and programme (e.g., longer duration, multi-component) characteristics, and inner (e.g., school resources, support for teachers) and outer (e.g., partnerships with Non-Governmental Organisations) settings. Cultural adaptations and implementation quality were highlighted as important (yet rarely fully reported) factors in ensuring programme sustainability and scaling-up. There is some supportive evidence for SB programmes in LMICs, though evidence for effectiveness varies by temporality of outcome and geographical location. This highlights the importance of considering implementation barriers across outcome trajectories and ensuring sufficient attention is given to cultural adaptations. Dual programmes combining balanced physical and mental health modules might offer promise for addressing the growing burden of non-communicable diseases in LMICs.

Clinical Psychology ReviewVol. 125
Schizophrenia Research Foundation (IN), University of Ibadan (NG), Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), Indian Law Institute (IN), University of Warwick (GB), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
School Health and Nursing Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.