System-Level Performance of Torque Vectoring Controllers for Electric Vehicles with In-Wheel Motors

<div>Torque Vectoring (TV) is a critical control technology for enhancing the vehicle dynamics and stability of electric vehicles equipped with four-wheel-independent-drive (4WID) systems. A central challenge in TV design is managing the trade-off between maximizing handling performance and minimizing energy consumption, a crucial factor for EV range. While numerous advanced TV control strategies have been proposed, a comprehensive and comparative benchmark of foundational controllers evaluated on a platform that captures this trade-off is notably absent from the literature. Among the numerous TV control strategies proposed in literature, they are typically evaluated using simplified vehicle models that neglect the detailed dynamics and efficiency losses of the electric powertrain. This study addresses this gap by presenting a comprehensive comparison of six distinct TV control strategies—PID, LQR, two first-order Sliding Mode Controls (SMC), and two second-order SMCs. The controllers are evaluated on a high-fidelity, multi-domain simulation platform that integrates a detailed 14-DOF vehicle dynamics model with electro-thermal models of the motors and energy storage system. The findings reveal a clear, quantifiable trade-off between control precision and energy efficiency. The LQR and suboptimal SOSM controllers delivered superior yaw rate tracking and vehicle stability but incurred a measurable energy penalty. In contrast, the PID and continuous FOSM controllers provided a robust balance of performance and efficiency. More than an exercise on application of different control methods, this research highlights the necessity of using integrated simulation methodologies for the practical design and calibration of active chassis systems, ensuring that gains in dynamic performance do not come at an unacceptable cost to vehicle range and powertrain reliability.</div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE International journal of vehicle dynamics, stability, and NVH
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/10-10-04-0029
Primary Topic
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

System-Level Performance of Torque Vectoring Controllers for Electric Vehicles with In-Wheel Motors

Henrique de Carvalho Pinheiro, Massimiliana Carello
SAE International journal of vehicle dynamics, stability, and NVH
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
article

System-Level Performance of Torque Vectoring Controllers for Electric Vehicles with In-Wheel Motors

Henrique de Carvalho Pinheiro, Massimiliana Carello
article en

Abstract

<div>Torque Vectoring (TV) is a critical control technology for enhancing the vehicle dynamics and stability of electric vehicles equipped with four-wheel-independent-drive (4WID) systems. A central challenge in TV design is managing the trade-off between maximizing handling performance and minimizing energy consumption, a crucial factor for EV range. While numerous advanced TV control strategies have been proposed, a comprehensive and comparative benchmark of foundational controllers evaluated on a platform that captures this trade-off is notably absent from the literature. Among the numerous TV control strategies proposed in literature, they are typically evaluated using simplified vehicle models that neglect the detailed dynamics and efficiency losses of the electric powertrain. This study addresses this gap by presenting a comprehensive comparison of six distinct TV control strategies—PID, LQR, two first-order Sliding Mode Controls (SMC), and two second-order SMCs. The controllers are evaluated on a high-fidelity, multi-domain simulation platform that integrates a detailed 14-DOF vehicle dynamics model with electro-thermal models of the motors and energy storage system. The findings reveal a clear, quantifiable trade-off between control precision and energy efficiency. The LQR and suboptimal SOSM controllers delivered superior yaw rate tracking and vehicle stability but incurred a measurable energy penalty. In contrast, the PID and continuous FOSM controllers provided a robust balance of performance and efficiency. More than an exercise on application of different control methods, this research highlights the necessity of using integrated simulation methodologies for the practical design and calibration of active chassis systems, ensuring that gains in dynamic performance do not come at an unacceptable cost to vehicle range and powertrain reliability.</div>

SAE International journal of vehicle dynamics, stability, and NVHVol. 10(4)
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.