Multiphase combustion modeling of ammonia–diesel RCCI engines using RANS, DES, and LES turbulence models

This work quantifies how spray atomization and vaporization govern ammonia–diesel RCCI combustion by comparing RANS (RNG k –ε), DES (SST k –ω), and LES (dynamic Smagorinsky). Beyond validation against in-cylinder pressure, HRR, CA50, and ITE, and pollutant emissions, we analyze DV10/DV50/DV90, SMD, parcel count, and penetration to expose turbulence–spray–chemistry couplings. LES Captures fine-scale dynamics, including rapid DV50 reduction (≈28 to ≈11.5 µm), enhanced secondary breakup, and core instabilities, generating >160,000 parcels and accelerating vaporization. These resolved phenomena translate into superior combustion fidelity, closely matching experiment peak pressure (84.2 vs 85 bar), CA50 (10.24° CA), ITE (37.218%), IMEP (≈9.1 bar), while accurately predicting emission (UHC: 0.48 g/kWh vs 0.46 g/kWh, NO: 2.15 g/kWh vs 2.20 g/kWh). DES offers intermediate fidelity, whereas RANS retains oversized droplets, slow vaporization, and underprediction of combustion intensity and The total computational expenditure amounted to approximately 410 CPU-h for RANS, 1240 CPU-h for DES, and 3240 CPU-h for LES, using meshes ranging from 200,000 to 8,000,000 cells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engine Research
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874261418173
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiphase combustion modeling of ammonia–diesel RCCI engines using RANS, DES, and LES turbulence models

Fathi Hamdi, Mouldi Chrigui, Takwa Hamdi, Samuel Molima
International Journal of Engine Research
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

Multiphase combustion modeling of ammonia–diesel RCCI engines using RANS, DES, and LES turbulence models

Fathi Hamdi, Mouldi Chrigui, Takwa Hamdi, Samuel Molima
article en

Abstract

This work quantifies how spray atomization and vaporization govern ammonia–diesel RCCI combustion by comparing RANS (RNG k –ε), DES (SST k –ω), and LES (dynamic Smagorinsky). Beyond validation against in-cylinder pressure, HRR, CA50, and ITE, and pollutant emissions, we analyze DV10/DV50/DV90, SMD, parcel count, and penetration to expose turbulence–spray–chemistry couplings. LES Captures fine-scale dynamics, including rapid DV50 reduction (≈28 to ≈11.5 µm), enhanced secondary breakup, and core instabilities, generating >160,000 parcels and accelerating vaporization. These resolved phenomena translate into superior combustion fidelity, closely matching experiment peak pressure (84.2 vs 85 bar), CA50 (10.24° CA), ITE (37.218%), IMEP (≈9.1 bar), while accurately predicting emission (UHC: 0.48 g/kWh vs 0.46 g/kWh, NO: 2.15 g/kWh vs 2.20 g/kWh). DES offers intermediate fidelity, whereas RANS retains oversized droplets, slow vaporization, and underprediction of combustion intensity and The total computational expenditure amounted to approximately 410 CPU-h for RANS, 1240 CPU-h for DES, and 3240 CPU-h for LES, using meshes ranging from 200,000 to 8,000,000 cells.

International Journal of Engine Research
Institut Supérieur de Technique Médicale (CD), University of Gabès (TN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.