Gastric Neoplasm Risk with DPP-4 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and SGLT2 Inhibitors: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Whether the risk of gastric neoplasm is modified by newer glucose-lowering therapies-dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)-remains uncertain. Given their global uptake and long-term use in populations already predisposed to malignancy, decision-grade comparative safety evidence is needed. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults without baseline gastric neoplasms. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalKey, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to 10 January 2026, without language restrictions. The primary outcome was incident gastric neoplasms (benign or malignant). Random-effects frequentist NMA estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); Bayesian NMA served as sensitivity analysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE adapted for NMA (PROSPERO CRD420261282728). Fifty-two RCTs (171,165 participants; mean age 63.6 years; 36.9% women; mean follow-up 141.8 weeks) were included. At the class level, GLP1RAs were associated with lower gastric neoplasm risk versus controls (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.92), whereas DPP4is were associated with higher risk (RR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.09-2.85). These signals persisted in prespecified subgroup analyses among participants with diabetes mellitus, in trials with duration ≥52 weeks (GLP1RA: RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.28-0.95; DPP4i: RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.19-3.55), and in older populations (age ≥60 years; DPP4i: RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.15-3.77). No class showed a significant association in younger participants (<60 years) or shorter trials (<52 weeks). Across available RCT evidence, GLP1RA prescription generally had a relatively lower gastric neoplasm risk than controls. In contrast, among patients with diabetes mellitus receiving longer-term therapy, GLP1RAs may be the preferable option from the perspective of gastric neoplasm risk, while DPP4is warrant heightened vigilance and mechanistic clarification. These findings support improved neoplasms ascertainment in future trials rather than immediate prescribing changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062619
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gastric Neoplasm Risk with DPP-4 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and SGLT2 Inhibitors: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Charlie Hsu, Yu‐Kang Tu, Yen-Wen Chen, Chih-Sung Liang et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Gastric Neoplasm Risk with DPP-4 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and SGLT2 Inhibitors: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Charlie Hsu, Yu‐Kang Tu, Yen-Wen Chen, Chih-Sung Liang, Tien-Yu Chen, Mein-Woei Suen, Andre F. Carvalho, Jiann-Jy Chen, Brendon Stubbs, Hung-Yu Wang, Ping-Tao Tseng, Shih-Pin Hsu, Bing-Yan Zeng, Bing-Syuan Zeng, Chao-Ming Hung
article en

Abstract

Whether the risk of gastric neoplasm is modified by newer glucose-lowering therapies-dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)-remains uncertain. Given their global uptake and long-term use in populations already predisposed to malignancy, decision-grade comparative safety evidence is needed. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults without baseline gastric neoplasms. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalKey, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to 10 January 2026, without language restrictions. The primary outcome was incident gastric neoplasms (benign or malignant). Random-effects frequentist NMA estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); Bayesian NMA served as sensitivity analysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE adapted for NMA (PROSPERO CRD420261282728). Fifty-two RCTs (171,165 participants; mean age 63.6 years; 36.9% women; mean follow-up 141.8 weeks) were included. At the class level, GLP1RAs were associated with lower gastric neoplasm risk versus controls (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.92), whereas DPP4is were associated with higher risk (RR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.09-2.85). These signals persisted in prespecified subgroup analyses among participants with diabetes mellitus, in trials with duration ≥52 weeks (GLP1RA: RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.28-0.95; DPP4i: RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.19-3.55), and in older populations (age ≥60 years; DPP4i: RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.15-3.77). No class showed a significant association in younger participants (<60 years) or shorter trials (<52 weeks). Across available RCT evidence, GLP1RA prescription generally had a relatively lower gastric neoplasm risk than controls. In contrast, among patients with diabetes mellitus receiving longer-term therapy, GLP1RAs may be the preferable option from the perspective of gastric neoplasm risk, while DPP4is warrant heightened vigilance and mechanistic clarification. These findings support improved neoplasms ascertainment in future trials rather than immediate prescribing changes.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 27(6)
Tri-Service General Hospital (TW), Barwon Health (AU), National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), Asia University (TW), National Taiwan University (TW), Chang Gung University (TW), King's College London (GB), China Medical University (TW), Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital (TW), Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), National Defense Medical Center (TW), Medical University of Vienna (AT), I-Shou University (TW)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.