Perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility in forensic death investigations: a new way to approach professional knowledge work

Abstract Organizational and sociological studies of professions typically approach knowledge as something professionals acquire during education, training, and work experience and apply flexibly when providing their services. This paper expands the view by addressing how professionals produce knowledge, asking how they make judgement about how far to pursue their knowledge-making. Based on original, qualitative data on forensic pathology in Sweden, I introduce the concept of knowledge-producing responsibility to address how such judgements take place relative to knowledge about causes of death. I present two perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility. The research perspective values detail, being extensive, and as close to the truth about the case as possible. The bureaucratic perspective focuses on delivery time, restrictive resource-use, and provision of answers. The question of how far to pursue investigations is incremental to all forms of knowledge production and hence of a general nature. Knowledge-producing responsibility offers several directions for potential studies of related questions of professional knowledge work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Professions and Organization
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag003
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility in forensic death investigations: a new way to approach professional knowledge work

Mikaela Sundberg
Journal of Professions and Organization
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility in forensic death investigations: a new way to approach professional knowledge work

Mikaela Sundberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Organizational and sociological studies of professions typically approach knowledge as something professionals acquire during education, training, and work experience and apply flexibly when providing their services. This paper expands the view by addressing how professionals produce knowledge, asking how they make judgement about how far to pursue their knowledge-making. Based on original, qualitative data on forensic pathology in Sweden, I introduce the concept of knowledge-producing responsibility to address how such judgements take place relative to knowledge about causes of death. I present two perspectives on knowledge-producing responsibility. The research perspective values detail, being extensive, and as close to the truth about the case as possible. The bureaucratic perspective focuses on delivery time, restrictive resource-use, and provision of answers. The question of how far to pursue investigations is incremental to all forms of knowledge production and hence of a general nature. Knowledge-producing responsibility offers several directions for potential studies of related questions of professional knowledge work.

Journal of Professions and OrganizationVol. 13(2)
Stockholm University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.