“Participation” models for environmental stewardship: roots, trajectories, and core principles from environmental communication and participatory communication for social change

Abstract “Participation” in the research trajectories of Participatory Communication for Social Change (PCSC) and Environmental Communication (EC) has been driven by many of the same points of concern, such as community engagement and decision-making power tied to conflict and cooperation. Despite these overlaps, the two subfields have largely developed their understanding of participation in isolation. To help bridge this gap, this article traces the roots and trajectories of PCSC’s and EC’s elaboration of participation through a review of the theoretical contributions and conceptual directions of key thinkers and guiding principles. This inventory is concluded by comparing the two subfields’ main features and common challenges. The article ends with recommendations for charting future paths of research and practice in environmental governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the International Communication Association
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlaf027
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Participation” models for environmental stewardship: roots, trajectories, and core principles from environmental communication and participatory communication for social change

Patrick D. Murphy
Annals of the International Communication Association
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

“Participation” models for environmental stewardship: roots, trajectories, and core principles from environmental communication and participatory communication for social change

Patrick D. Murphy
article en

Abstract

Abstract “Participation” in the research trajectories of Participatory Communication for Social Change (PCSC) and Environmental Communication (EC) has been driven by many of the same points of concern, such as community engagement and decision-making power tied to conflict and cooperation. Despite these overlaps, the two subfields have largely developed their understanding of participation in isolation. To help bridge this gap, this article traces the roots and trajectories of PCSC’s and EC’s elaboration of participation through a review of the theoretical contributions and conceptual directions of key thinkers and guiding principles. This inventory is concluded by comparing the two subfields’ main features and common challenges. The article ends with recommendations for charting future paths of research and practice in environmental governance.

Annals of the International Communication AssociationVol. 50(1)
Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.