Comparative Analysis of the Operational Status of Leading Forest Management Zones for the Advancement of Forest Management Strategies: A Case Study in South Korea

Following successful national forest restoration projects, South Korea has designated and operates Leading Forest Management Zones (LFMZs) to improve forest quality and promote sustainable use. The objective of this study is to comparatively evaluate the operational characteristics of 26 LFMZs (5 national and 21 private forests) based on complete long-term data from 2013 to 2024 and to identify ownership-based structural differences in integrated forest management performance. Five core indicators representing the forest management cycle (afforestation, timber harvest, forest products, forest roads, and forest tending) were analyzed using multivariate statistical methods. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) results revealed statistically significant structural differences between national and private forest management systems (F = 13.22, p = 0.001, R2 = 0.47). Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) identified forest road development and timber harvest intensity as the primary drivers of these differences. National forest LFMZs exhibited consistently higher and more balanced management intensity across all indicators, supported by stable institutional frameworks and professional management capacity. In contrast, private forest LFMZs showed substantial variability in performance, reflecting differences in ownership structure and regional conditions. Correlation analysis further demonstrated strong positive relationships among afforestation, forest tending, forest road development, and timber harvest, underscoring the importance of integrated forest management. These findings provide empirical evidence to support differentiated, ownership-sensitive forest management strategies and contribute to strengthening sustainable forest governance in South Korea under climate change and socio-economic transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030360
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Operational Status of Leading Forest Management Zones for the Advancement of Forest Management Strategies: A Case Study in South Korea

Hyunsun A. Kim, G. Y. Lee, Seungho Kim, Soongil Kwon et al.
Forests
Forest Management and Policy
article

Comparative Analysis of the Operational Status of Leading Forest Management Zones for the Advancement of Forest Management Strategies: A Case Study in South Korea

Hyunsun A. Kim, G. Y. Lee, Seungho Kim, Soongil Kwon, Chiung Ko
article en

Abstract

Following successful national forest restoration projects, South Korea has designated and operates Leading Forest Management Zones (LFMZs) to improve forest quality and promote sustainable use. The objective of this study is to comparatively evaluate the operational characteristics of 26 LFMZs (5 national and 21 private forests) based on complete long-term data from 2013 to 2024 and to identify ownership-based structural differences in integrated forest management performance. Five core indicators representing the forest management cycle (afforestation, timber harvest, forest products, forest roads, and forest tending) were analyzed using multivariate statistical methods. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) results revealed statistically significant structural differences between national and private forest management systems (F = 13.22, p = 0.001, R2 = 0.47). Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) identified forest road development and timber harvest intensity as the primary drivers of these differences. National forest LFMZs exhibited consistently higher and more balanced management intensity across all indicators, supported by stable institutional frameworks and professional management capacity. In contrast, private forest LFMZs showed substantial variability in performance, reflecting differences in ownership structure and regional conditions. Correlation analysis further demonstrated strong positive relationships among afforestation, forest tending, forest road development, and timber harvest, underscoring the importance of integrated forest management. These findings provide empirical evidence to support differentiated, ownership-sensitive forest management strategies and contribute to strengthening sustainable forest governance in South Korea under climate change and socio-economic transitions.

ForestsVol. 17(3)
Korea Forest Service (KR), Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
National Institute of Forest Science
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.