Differences in Management of Neonates with Hypoxic–Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) by Level of Neonatal Care Provided at Birth: Insights from a Referral-Based Cohort in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Background/Objectives: Neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) are born in delivery facilities with different levels of neonatal care. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in the incidence of HIE and postnatal management between different levels of neonatal care in delivery facilities. Methods: This is a retrospective, multi-center cohort study of neonates with moderate-to-severe HIE receiving therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, registered in the Swiss National Asphyxia and Cooling Register between 2015 and 2023. Incidences of HIE receiving TH were calculated for all delivery facilities according to the national levels of neonatal care on site (Level I—basic; Level IIB—intermediate (no Level IIA facility in the Canton of Zurich); Level III—intensive neonatal care). Perinatal characteristics and variables on transport and outcomes were compared between neonates born in Level I and Level IIB facilities (the majority of the HIE population) and reported for neonates born in all other facilities (for completeness). Results: A total of 173 neonates (79 (45.7%) born in Level I; 80 (46.2%) in Level IIB; 9 (5.2%) in Level III; 5 (2.9%) in birthing centers) were admitted to a neonatal cooling center to receive TH. The average number of annual cases of HIE receiving TH per facility was 0.67 (0.11–1.50) in Level I and 2.22 (0.22–3.11) in Level IIB facilities (p = 0.088), respectively. There was no difference in Apgar score, worst pH (within 60 min after birth) and the severity of encephalopathy between neonates born in Level I and Level IIB facilities. Neonatal transport team requests were initiated earlier in Level I facilities (median 12 vs. 34 min of life, p < 0.001). There was no difference in age at initiation of TH (median 3 vs. 3 h, p = 0.431) and the time when target temperature was reached (median 4 vs. 4 h, p = 0.431) between neonates born in Level I and Level IIB facilities. Conclusions: The level of neonatal care available in delivery facilities influenced the management of neonates with HIE receiving TH.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292902
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Management of Neonates with Hypoxic–Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) by Level of Neonatal Care Provided at Birth: Insights from a Referral-Based Cohort in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Vinzenz Boos, Ariane Pfister, Michael Kleber, Ladina Erni et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
article

Differences in Management of Neonates with Hypoxic–Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) by Level of Neonatal Care Provided at Birth: Insights from a Referral-Based Cohort in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Vinzenz Boos, Ariane Pfister, Michael Kleber, Ladina Erni, Dirk Bassler, Christian Haslinger, Barbara Brotschi, Beate Grass
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) are born in delivery facilities with different levels of neonatal care. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in the incidence of HIE and postnatal management between different levels of neonatal care in delivery facilities. Methods: This is a retrospective, multi-center cohort study of neonates with moderate-to-severe HIE receiving therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, registered in the Swiss National Asphyxia and Cooling Register between 2015 and 2023. Incidences of HIE receiving TH were calculated for all delivery facilities according to the national levels of neonatal care on site (Level I—basic; Level IIB—intermediate (no Level IIA facility in the Canton of Zurich); Level III—intensive neonatal care). Perinatal characteristics and variables on transport and outcomes were compared between neonates born in Level I and Level IIB facilities (the majority of the HIE population) and reported for neonates born in all other facilities (for completeness). Results: A total of 173 neonates (79 (45.7%) born in Level I; 80 (46.2%) in Level IIB; 9 (5.2%) in Level III; 5 (2.9%) in birthing centers) were admitted to a neonatal cooling center to receive TH. The average number of annual cases of HIE receiving TH per facility was 0.67 (0.11–1.50) in Level I and 2.22 (0.22–3.11) in Level IIB facilities (p = 0.088), respectively. There was no difference in Apgar score, worst pH (within 60 min after birth) and the severity of encephalopathy between neonates born in Level I and Level IIB facilities. Neonatal transport team requests were initiated earlier in Level I facilities (median 12 vs. 34 min of life, p < 0.001). There was no difference in age at initiation of TH (median 3 vs. 3 h, p = 0.431) and the time when target temperature was reached (median 4 vs. 4 h, p = 0.431) between neonates born in Level I and Level IIB facilities. Conclusions: The level of neonatal care available in delivery facilities influenced the management of neonates with HIE receiving TH.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.