Validation of the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) in patients with multiple myeloma who were enrolled in the CARTITUDE-4 trial

The Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) is a validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that measures symptoms and impacts experienced by patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We describe key measurement properties of the MySIm-Q instrument using CARTITUDE-4 data. The phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) trial compares ciltacabtagene autoleucel with standard-of-care regimens in patients with lenalidomide-refractory MM after 1–3 lines of therapy. Following US Food and Drug Administration guidance on the use of PRO measures in clinical trials, the reliability, as well as aspects of construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity of the MySIm-Q symptom and impact scores (2 separate concepts) were assessed. In total, 361 patients completed MySIm-Q assessments. Internal consistency results met the predefined threshold (McDonald’s ꞷ coefficient > 0.7; ꞷ=0.87 for total symptom scores, ꞷ=0.79 for total impact scores), while test-retest reliability was slightly below this threshold (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC](2,1) > 0.70; ICC = 0.67 and 0.65, respectively). Known-groups validity of total symptom and total impact scores was established through multiple hypotheses. Factor scores estimated from the confirmatory factor analysis model were highly correlated with simple observed scores calculated in symptom and impact scores. Item-level convergent and discriminant validity was supported for all and nearly all items, respectively. Domain convergent and discriminant validity for total scores were largely met. These results demonstrate that the MySIm-Q yields reliable and valid scores based on a number of evidentiary sources, supporting its use as a fit-for-purpose PRO instrument in clinical outcome assessments for patients with MM. CARTITUDE-4: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04181827. Date of registration: 27 November 2019. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04181827.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01034-z
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) in patients with multiple myeloma who were enrolled in the CARTITUDE-4 trial

Anne K. Mylin, Kai Fai Ho, Eva G. Katz, Erika Florendo et al.
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Validation of the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) in patients with multiple myeloma who were enrolled in the CARTITUDE-4 trial

Anne K. Mylin, Kai Fai Ho, Eva G. Katz, Erika Florendo, Nikoletta K. Lendvai, Hila Magen, Winfried Alsdorf, Iris Isufi, Katharine S. Gries, Carolina Lonardi, Ana Slaughter, Jordan Mark Schecter, William Deraedt, Hisayuki Yokoyama, André De Champlain, Octavio Costa Filho, Simon J. Harrison, Leyla Shune, Nitin Patel, Urvi A. Shah, Roberto Mina, Lionel Karlin, Katja Weisel
article en

Abstract

The Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) is a validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that measures symptoms and impacts experienced by patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We describe key measurement properties of the MySIm-Q instrument using CARTITUDE-4 data. The phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) trial compares ciltacabtagene autoleucel with standard-of-care regimens in patients with lenalidomide-refractory MM after 1–3 lines of therapy. Following US Food and Drug Administration guidance on the use of PRO measures in clinical trials, the reliability, as well as aspects of construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity of the MySIm-Q symptom and impact scores (2 separate concepts) were assessed. In total, 361 patients completed MySIm-Q assessments. Internal consistency results met the predefined threshold (McDonald’s ꞷ coefficient > 0.7; ꞷ=0.87 for total symptom scores, ꞷ=0.79 for total impact scores), while test-retest reliability was slightly below this threshold (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC](2,1) > 0.70; ICC = 0.67 and 0.65, respectively). Known-groups validity of total symptom and total impact scores was established through multiple hypotheses. Factor scores estimated from the confirmatory factor analysis model were highly correlated with simple observed scores calculated in symptom and impact scores. Item-level convergent and discriminant validity was supported for all and nearly all items, respectively. Domain convergent and discriminant validity for total scores were largely met. These results demonstrate that the MySIm-Q yields reliable and valid scores based on a number of evidentiary sources, supporting its use as a fit-for-purpose PRO instrument in clinical outcome assessments for patients with MM. CARTITUDE-4: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04181827. Date of registration: 27 November 2019. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04181827.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Statistics Canada (CA), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Emory Healthcare (US), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Emory University (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), Tel Aviv University (IL), Tohoku University (JP), Cornell University (US), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Rigshospitalet (DK), Yale University (US), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Hôpital Lyon Sud (FR), University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.