Simple network models integrate global change, social dynamics and management interventions in biosecurity scenario analysis

Global change and public participation are both areas of considerable uncertainty in estimating the success of biosecurity response strategies, but are poorly integrated in most available scenario analysis frameworks. We introduce INApest() , a novel network simulation method which integrates social and global change factors, as well as pest biology and multiple management variables in scenario analyses of biosecurity responses. INApest() separates the management response into four key parameters: probability of detection; management adoption; eradication of local populations; spread reduction (e.g. through movement restrictions or hygiene measures). It also permits simulation of biosecurity responses which evolve organically as new incidences of the pest are detected and information about the pest and management technologies spread through the network. We demonstrate selected functionality of INApest() using Nassella neesiana (Chilean Needle Grass; CNG), a slow-spreading pasture weed that impacts animal health, as a case-study. Realistic historical CNG spread rates are reproduced under a no management scenario using dispersal kernels derived from known natural and human-mediated spread mechanisms. Scenario analyses comparing over 15,000 parameter combinations reveal that communication of invasive threat to farms neighbouring known infestations significantly reduces the farm-scale eradication probability and spread reduction required for management success (i.e. success is achieved at lower levels of farm-scale management practice efficacy). We use targeted simulation experiments to show how INApest() permits assessment of cross-border consequences of local management decisions and how communication between landowners interacts with climate change and surveillance effort to impact management success. INApest() has the potential to be used at multiple scales and to explore a wide range of management, global change and social scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeoBiota
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.106.161880
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simple network models integrate global change, social dynamics and management interventions in biosecurity scenario analysis

Norman W. H. Mason, Geoff Kaine, Karen A. Garrett, Chris McGrannachan et al.
NeoBiota
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

Simple network models integrate global change, social dynamics and management interventions in biosecurity scenario analysis

Norman W. H. Mason, Geoff Kaine, Karen A. Garrett, Chris McGrannachan, Christopher E. Buddenhagen, Graeme W. Bourdôt, Shona L. Lamoureaux
article en

Abstract

Global change and public participation are both areas of considerable uncertainty in estimating the success of biosecurity response strategies, but are poorly integrated in most available scenario analysis frameworks. We introduce INApest() , a novel network simulation method which integrates social and global change factors, as well as pest biology and multiple management variables in scenario analyses of biosecurity responses. INApest() separates the management response into four key parameters: probability of detection; management adoption; eradication of local populations; spread reduction (e.g. through movement restrictions or hygiene measures). It also permits simulation of biosecurity responses which evolve organically as new incidences of the pest are detected and information about the pest and management technologies spread through the network. We demonstrate selected functionality of INApest() using Nassella neesiana (Chilean Needle Grass; CNG), a slow-spreading pasture weed that impacts animal health, as a case-study. Realistic historical CNG spread rates are reproduced under a no management scenario using dispersal kernels derived from known natural and human-mediated spread mechanisms. Scenario analyses comparing over 15,000 parameter combinations reveal that communication of invasive threat to farms neighbouring known infestations significantly reduces the farm-scale eradication probability and spread reduction required for management success (i.e. success is achieved at lower levels of farm-scale management practice efficacy). We use targeted simulation experiments to show how INApest() permits assessment of cross-border consequences of local management decisions and how communication between landowners interacts with climate change and surveillance effort to impact management success. INApest() has the potential to be used at multiple scales and to explore a wide range of management, global change and social scenarios.

NeoBiotaVol. 106
Lincoln University (NZ), University of Florida (US), Unitec Institute of Technology (NZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.