Prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to implant-supported prostheses and relationship with implant location and the manner of restoration placement: a retrospective cohort study

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the overall prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to implant-supported protheses (ISPs). Secondary objectives were to determine how different implant restoration placement options (direct to implant, intermediate abutment, or Ti-Base) and/or ISP location influence the occurrence of caries. This retrospective cohort study was performed at the University Clinic of King Juan Carlos University (URJC, Madrid, Spain), between January 2018 and December 2023, following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Both single crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by implants were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the relevant variables. Associations between different groups (direct to implant, Ti-base, and intermediate abutment) were analyzed. The study evaluated 445 implant-supported protheses in 359 patients. The overall prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to ISPs at patient level was 8.9% (95% CI: 5.95% to 11.84%) and 8.1% (95% CI: 5.56% to 10.63%) at prothesis level. Prevalence was higher in the molar region (9.6%; 95% CI: 5.7% to 13.4%), followed by premolar sites (8.6%; 95% CI: 4.2% to 12.9%). The highest prevalence of caries was found in teeth adjacent to ISPs placed direct to implant (11.4%; 95% CI: 7.3% to 15.4%); followed by teeth adjacent to implants restored with Ti-Base (10.5%; 95% CI: 0.0% to 24.2%). Those teeth adjacent to implants restored using intermediate abutments had the lowest prevalence (3.7%; 95% CI: 1% to 6.3%). Statistically significant differences between restoration groups were observed (p = 0.013). Moreover, the odds of caries increased by 3.37 times in teeth adjacent to ISPs placed direct to implant compared with those restored with intermediate abutments. The prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to ISPs is significantly higher in implants restored direct to implant compared with those restored with intermediate abutments. Selecting the appropriate implant-supported restoration placement option may reduce caries in teeth adjacent to an ISP. Intermediate abutments would appear to reduce the risk of caries compared with direct implant restorations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-06785-z
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to implant-supported prostheses and relationship with implant location and the manner of restoration placement: a retrospective cohort study

Diego Gómez-Costa, Luis Sánchez-Labrador, Pablo Lastra-Prados, Antonio Francisco López-Sánchez et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to implant-supported prostheses and relationship with implant location and the manner of restoration placement: a retrospective cohort study

Diego Gómez-Costa, Luis Sánchez-Labrador, Pablo Lastra-Prados, Antonio Francisco López-Sánchez, Jesús Rodríguez-Molinero, Marta Hernández de Oliveira, Jorge Cortés-Bretón Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann
article en

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the overall prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to implant-supported protheses (ISPs). Secondary objectives were to determine how different implant restoration placement options (direct to implant, intermediate abutment, or Ti-Base) and/or ISP location influence the occurrence of caries. This retrospective cohort study was performed at the University Clinic of King Juan Carlos University (URJC, Madrid, Spain), between January 2018 and December 2023, following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Both single crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by implants were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the relevant variables. Associations between different groups (direct to implant, Ti-base, and intermediate abutment) were analyzed. The study evaluated 445 implant-supported protheses in 359 patients. The overall prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to ISPs at patient level was 8.9% (95% CI: 5.95% to 11.84%) and 8.1% (95% CI: 5.56% to 10.63%) at prothesis level. Prevalence was higher in the molar region (9.6%; 95% CI: 5.7% to 13.4%), followed by premolar sites (8.6%; 95% CI: 4.2% to 12.9%). The highest prevalence of caries was found in teeth adjacent to ISPs placed direct to implant (11.4%; 95% CI: 7.3% to 15.4%); followed by teeth adjacent to implants restored with Ti-Base (10.5%; 95% CI: 0.0% to 24.2%). Those teeth adjacent to implants restored using intermediate abutments had the lowest prevalence (3.7%; 95% CI: 1% to 6.3%). Statistically significant differences between restoration groups were observed (p = 0.013). Moreover, the odds of caries increased by 3.37 times in teeth adjacent to ISPs placed direct to implant compared with those restored with intermediate abutments. The prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to ISPs is significantly higher in implants restored direct to implant compared with those restored with intermediate abutments. Selecting the appropriate implant-supported restoration placement option may reduce caries in teeth adjacent to an ISP. Intermediate abutments would appear to reduce the risk of caries compared with direct implant restorations.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 30(4)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Instituto Cajal (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.