The Ethics of Misplacement: Why AI Ethics Keeps Assigning Moral Responsibility to the Wrong Object

Conceptual working paper on moral attribution and responsibility placement in contemporary AI discourse. This paper argues that much of contemporary AI ethics rests on a structural misplacement of moral focus. Large language models are frequently treated as though they were quasi-human moral actors, while the human and institutional arrangements shaping their behavior become harder to see. The paper distinguishes among causal involvement, moral agency, operational responsibility, and institutional failure, and argues that these layers are often collapsed into simplified public narratives. Rather than treating AI ethics primarily as a problem of constraining artificial moral agents, this paper reframes it as a problem of tracing and structuring responsibility within human socio-technical systems. Preprint / not peer reviewed. Working draft, March 2026. This paper is conceptual rather than empirical. It proposes an interpretive framework for analyzing the structural misplacement of moral attribution in AI discourse.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18994728
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics of Misplacement: Why AI Ethics Keeps Assigning Moral Responsibility to the Wrong Object

Hinano Kimura
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Ethics of Misplacement: Why AI Ethics Keeps Assigning Moral Responsibility to the Wrong Object

Hinano Kimura
article en

Abstract

Conceptual working paper on moral attribution and responsibility placement in contemporary AI discourse. This paper argues that much of contemporary AI ethics rests on a structural misplacement of moral focus. Large language models are frequently treated as though they were quasi-human moral actors, while the human and institutional arrangements shaping their behavior become harder to see. The paper distinguishes among causal involvement, moral agency, operational responsibility, and institutional failure, and argues that these layers are often collapsed into simplified public narratives. Rather than treating AI ethics primarily as a problem of constraining artificial moral agents, this paper reframes it as a problem of tracing and structuring responsibility within human socio-technical systems. Preprint / not peer reviewed. Working draft, March 2026. This paper is conceptual rather than empirical. It proposes an interpretive framework for analyzing the structural misplacement of moral attribution in AI discourse.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.