From words to action? How procedural norms contribute to building transnational labour relations via global framework agreements

Global framework agreements (GFAs) have the potential to alter the practice of labour relations in multinational companies (MNCs). Analysis of the launching of GFAs and their negotiations, as well as their role in setting labour standards has already received much attention in the literature. This article extends these analyses by examining how GFAs’ procedural norms shape implementation in practice. Based on qualitative case studies of 12 MNCs, we develop a typology of procedural norms and analyse how they differ in terms of implementation. Our findings show that procedural design – particularly the distinction between event-driven and systematic monitoring and the establishment of distinct transnational arenas – is closely related to how implementation practices are organised. We conclude by discussing what these configurations imply for the potential to institutionalise transnational levels of labour relations in MNCs and further questions related to international industrial relations research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589261428689
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From words to action? How procedural norms contribute to building transnational labour relations via global framework agreements

Thomas Haipeter, Markus Helfen, Sophie Rosenbohm
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Labor Movements and Unions
article

From words to action? How procedural norms contribute to building transnational labour relations via global framework agreements

Thomas Haipeter, Markus Helfen, Sophie Rosenbohm
article en

Abstract

Global framework agreements (GFAs) have the potential to alter the practice of labour relations in multinational companies (MNCs). Analysis of the launching of GFAs and their negotiations, as well as their role in setting labour standards has already received much attention in the literature. This article extends these analyses by examining how GFAs’ procedural norms shape implementation in practice. Based on qualitative case studies of 12 MNCs, we develop a typology of procedural norms and analyse how they differ in terms of implementation. Our findings show that procedural design – particularly the distinction between event-driven and systematic monitoring and the establishment of distinct transnational arenas – is closely related to how implementation practices are organised. We conclude by discussing what these configurations imply for the potential to institutionalise transnational levels of labour relations in MNCs and further questions related to international industrial relations research and practice.

Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.