Automating Critical Care EEG: Enhancing Accuracy, Efficiency, and Patient Outcomes in Critical Care

The rapid expansion of continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring in critically ill patients has created a growing gap between data acquisition and the clinical capacity to interpret these data in a timely manner. This mismatch has emerged alongside major advances in EEG automation, which promise to support more efficient and clinically integrated interpretation. At the same time, evidence guiding the optimal, safe, and ethically responsible use of these tools remains limited. In this review, we trace the historical development of EEG analysis methods from early automation to contemporary AI-based approaches and examine their application in neurocritical care. We discuss the potential benefits and limitations of quantitative EEG and AI for EEG processing, as well as the role of AI in supporting clinical decision-making in these populations when integrated with electronic medical record systems. By focusing on practical implementation and real-world constraints, we aim to show how automated and AI-assisted tools can augment, rather than replace, clinical expertise and help improve the timeliness and quality of patient-centered care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597261426958
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating Critical Care EEG: Enhancing Accuracy, Efficiency, and Patient Outcomes in Critical Care

Edilberto Amorim, Maria Bruzzone, Sahar F. Zafar, Erafat Rehim et al.
Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Automating Critical Care EEG: Enhancing Accuracy, Efficiency, and Patient Outcomes in Critical Care

Edilberto Amorim, Maria Bruzzone, Sahar F. Zafar, Erafat Rehim, Clio Rubiños, Zubeda Sheikh, Andres Rodriguez-Ruiz
article en

Abstract

The rapid expansion of continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring in critically ill patients has created a growing gap between data acquisition and the clinical capacity to interpret these data in a timely manner. This mismatch has emerged alongside major advances in EEG automation, which promise to support more efficient and clinically integrated interpretation. At the same time, evidence guiding the optimal, safe, and ethically responsible use of these tools remains limited. In this review, we trace the historical development of EEG analysis methods from early automation to contemporary AI-based approaches and examine their application in neurocritical care. We discuss the potential benefits and limitations of quantitative EEG and AI for EEG processing, as well as the role of AI in supporting clinical decision-making in these populations when integrated with electronic medical record systems. By focusing on practical implementation and real-world constraints, we aim to show how automated and AI-assisted tools can augment, rather than replace, clinical expertise and help improve the timeliness and quality of patient-centered care.

Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Emory University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Florida (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.