Judicial Institutions, Independence, and the Separation of Powers

We study the separation of powers between judicial and legislative institutions among the American states. Building upon previous studies, we consider how judicial selection/accountability mechanisms affect the judicial-legislative separation of powers game. We specify game theoretic models that consider these issues. Our formal models demonstrate that judicial elections can empower courts by providing them with direct signals of legitimacy from voters. We then examine the use of judicial review in state supreme courts between 2007 and 2017 both at the institutional and justice level. Our results suggest that electoral institutions empower courts in the separation of powers game, as these institutions are associated with significantly higher odds of invalidating legislative acts compared to unelected courts. Furthermore, we find no evidence that legislative court-curbing efforts constrain judicial independence and argue the time may be ripe to revisit the role court-curbing plays in judicial preemption in American politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Quarterly
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261426540
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial Institutions, Independence, and the Separation of Powers

Teena Wilhelm, David Hughes
Political Research Quarterly
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Judicial Institutions, Independence, and the Separation of Powers

Teena Wilhelm, David Hughes
article en

Abstract

We study the separation of powers between judicial and legislative institutions among the American states. Building upon previous studies, we consider how judicial selection/accountability mechanisms affect the judicial-legislative separation of powers game. We specify game theoretic models that consider these issues. Our formal models demonstrate that judicial elections can empower courts by providing them with direct signals of legitimacy from voters. We then examine the use of judicial review in state supreme courts between 2007 and 2017 both at the institutional and justice level. Our results suggest that electoral institutions empower courts in the separation of powers game, as these institutions are associated with significantly higher odds of invalidating legislative acts compared to unelected courts. Furthermore, we find no evidence that legislative court-curbing efforts constrain judicial independence and argue the time may be ripe to revisit the role court-curbing plays in judicial preemption in American politics.

Political Research Quarterly
University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.