Memory, authoritarianism, and the arts after the 1965 killings in Indonesia: Who has “The Right to Look” at history?

This article examines the ways that Indonesian visual art and culture created after the 1965–1966 killings engages with collective memory, state power, and the politics of visuality. Drawing on ethnographic interviews with Indonesian artists, this article analyzes how the New Order regime utilized propaganda and visual culture to promote an official memory of the 1965–1966 mass killings, and how contemporary artists have since created counter-visual narratives that challenge this hegemonic memory. Using Nicholas Mirzoeff’s concept of “The Right to Look,” I argue that visuality is an important consideration in struggles over memory after an atrocity or violent conflict. By situating these cases within broader debates in memory studies, this research also highlights how visual culture shapes public understanding after an atrocity and opens space for dialogue and historical accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory Studies
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980261425550
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Memory, authoritarianism, and the arts after the 1965 killings in Indonesia: Who has “The Right to Look” at history?

Shelly Clay-Robison
Memory Studies
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Memory, authoritarianism, and the arts after the 1965 killings in Indonesia: Who has “The Right to Look” at history?

Shelly Clay-Robison
article en

Abstract

This article examines the ways that Indonesian visual art and culture created after the 1965–1966 killings engages with collective memory, state power, and the politics of visuality. Drawing on ethnographic interviews with Indonesian artists, this article analyzes how the New Order regime utilized propaganda and visual culture to promote an official memory of the 1965–1966 mass killings, and how contemporary artists have since created counter-visual narratives that challenge this hegemonic memory. Using Nicholas Mirzoeff’s concept of “The Right to Look,” I argue that visuality is an important consideration in struggles over memory after an atrocity or violent conflict. By situating these cases within broader debates in memory studies, this research also highlights how visual culture shapes public understanding after an atrocity and opens space for dialogue and historical accountability.

Memory Studies
George Mason University (US), University of Baltimore (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Memory, authoritarianism, and the arts after the 1965 killings in Indonesia: Who has “The Right to Look” at history? — Shelly Clay-Robison · Memory Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS