Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL): a translation and validation study

The purpose of this study was to translate the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL) from English to Chinese and examine its reliability and validity among pregnant women. This study adhered strictly to Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural adaptation and translation. The Chinese version of the Quality of Life in Pregnancy Scale was formed through a pre-test, involving 823 pregnant women in the methodological investigation. Item analysis was employed to screen scale items, while internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test–retest reliability were used to assess the scale’s reliability. Content validity, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were utilized to validate the scale. The Chinese version comprised 25 items across five dimensions: Perception of general satisfaction, physical domain, social domain, social support domain, and emotional domain. The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.902, with dimension-specific alpha values ranging from 0.832 to 0.920. The split-half reliability of the scale was 0.836, and its retest reliability was 0.854. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO value was 0.898, and the Bartlett's spherical test X2 value was 4269.162 (p < 0.001). In the validation factor analysis, the model fit results were X2 / df = 1.253, RMSEA = 0.025, CFI = 0.984, GFI = 0.984, IFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.981, NFI = 0.924, and AGFI = 0.923, indicating excellent model fit. The composite reliability of the dimensions ranged from 0.775 to 0.911, the average variance extracted ranged from 0.503 to 0.535. The correlation coefficient between each dimension and other dimensions was less than the square root of the AVE for that dimension. The Chinese version of the PREG-QOL demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity, which is suitable for assessing the quality of life among pregnant women in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-08644-x
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL): a translation and validation study

Shuming Guo, Chunyan Wu, Yihui Duan, Yuyi Luo et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
article

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL): a translation and validation study

Shuming Guo, Chunyan Wu, Yihui Duan, Yuyi Luo, Yuhong Xu, Chaonan Wang
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL) from English to Chinese and examine its reliability and validity among pregnant women. This study adhered strictly to Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural adaptation and translation. The Chinese version of the Quality of Life in Pregnancy Scale was formed through a pre-test, involving 823 pregnant women in the methodological investigation. Item analysis was employed to screen scale items, while internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test–retest reliability were used to assess the scale’s reliability. Content validity, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were utilized to validate the scale. The Chinese version comprised 25 items across five dimensions: Perception of general satisfaction, physical domain, social domain, social support domain, and emotional domain. The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.902, with dimension-specific alpha values ranging from 0.832 to 0.920. The split-half reliability of the scale was 0.836, and its retest reliability was 0.854. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO value was 0.898, and the Bartlett's spherical test X2 value was 4269.162 (p < 0.001). In the validation factor analysis, the model fit results were X2 / df = 1.253, RMSEA = 0.025, CFI = 0.984, GFI = 0.984, IFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.981, NFI = 0.924, and AGFI = 0.923, indicating excellent model fit. The composite reliability of the dimensions ranged from 0.775 to 0.911, the average variance extracted ranged from 0.503 to 0.535. The correlation coefficient between each dimension and other dimensions was less than the square root of the AVE for that dimension. The Chinese version of the PREG-QOL demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity, which is suitable for assessing the quality of life among pregnant women in China.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Shanxi Medical University (CN), Changzhi Medical College (CN), Xian Central Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.