A scoping review of music-based digital therapeutics for stress, anxiety, and depression

Rising rates of stress, anxiety, and depression—fueled by rapid sociocultural and economic shifts, digital overexposure, and the lasting impact of COVID-19—are accelerating investment in scalable tools aimed at enhancing resilience and wellbeing. Music-based digital therapeutics (MDTs) hold promise given music’s unique ability to modulate core dimensions of health—affect, anxiety, and reward, as well as autonomic and social functioning—through a medium that is universal, intuitive, and increasingly accessible. To assess the current state of MDTs targeting stress, anxiety, and depression in adults, we conducted a scoping review using a modified Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) keyword framework to structure Google search results. Twenty-two commercially available MDTs were identified for inclusion. We organize these MDTs into five principal categories based on underlying treatment strategies: (1) Preference-based music selection; (2) Affective Parameterization; (3) Affect Matching and Compensation; (4) Neural Entrainment; and (5) Biofeedback. We review general evidence supporting each strategy from music neuroscience and therapy research, as well as limited applied research testing specific MDTs. We conclude that, while general evidence supporting musical-based interventions for stress, anxiety, and depression is substantial, evidence for MDTs specifically is presently too limited to draw conclusions about real world effectiveness. Determining whether MDTs are likely to fulfill their potential will require increased focus on rigorous laboratory studies testing specific treatment strategies and randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted in ecologically valid settings. To support progress in this field, we make recommendations to support the sustainable development of MDTs as evidence-based tools to support mental health and wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1602004
Primary Topic
Music Therapy and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of music-based digital therapeutics for stress, anxiety, and depression

Daniel Liu Bowling, Tara Venkatesan, Audrey Hempel, Andrew M. Demetriou
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Music Therapy and Health
article

A scoping review of music-based digital therapeutics for stress, anxiety, and depression

Daniel Liu Bowling, Tara Venkatesan, Audrey Hempel, Andrew M. Demetriou
article en

Abstract

Rising rates of stress, anxiety, and depression—fueled by rapid sociocultural and economic shifts, digital overexposure, and the lasting impact of COVID-19—are accelerating investment in scalable tools aimed at enhancing resilience and wellbeing. Music-based digital therapeutics (MDTs) hold promise given music’s unique ability to modulate core dimensions of health—affect, anxiety, and reward, as well as autonomic and social functioning—through a medium that is universal, intuitive, and increasingly accessible. To assess the current state of MDTs targeting stress, anxiety, and depression in adults, we conducted a scoping review using a modified Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) keyword framework to structure Google search results. Twenty-two commercially available MDTs were identified for inclusion. We organize these MDTs into five principal categories based on underlying treatment strategies: (1) Preference-based music selection; (2) Affective Parameterization; (3) Affect Matching and Compensation; (4) Neural Entrainment; and (5) Biofeedback. We review general evidence supporting each strategy from music neuroscience and therapy research, as well as limited applied research testing specific MDTs. We conclude that, while general evidence supporting musical-based interventions for stress, anxiety, and depression is substantial, evidence for MDTs specifically is presently too limited to draw conclusions about real world effectiveness. Determining whether MDTs are likely to fulfill their potential will require increased focus on rigorous laboratory studies testing specific treatment strategies and randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted in ecologically valid settings. To support progress in this field, we make recommendations to support the sustainable development of MDTs as evidence-based tools to support mental health and wellbeing.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 20
University of London (GB), School of Advanced Study (GB), Stanford Medicine (US), Universal Music Group (United States) (US), Stanford University (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Music Therapy and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.