Stratified consumer activism: How socioeconomic status shapes boycott participation

Abstract Consumer activism is becoming increasingly common worldwide, but are all consumer groups as likely to engage in these practices? The current research investigates the presence of socioeconomic status (SES) differences in boycotting participation and explores the psychological processes underlying potential discrepancies. Results from four studies, including cross‐national surveys, experiments, and lab‐in‐the‐field evidence, show that low‐SES consumers display a lower likelihood of boycotting companies than their high‐SES peers. The phenomenon emerges across different measures, including self‐reported intentions, past actions, and actual behaviors. This reduced inclination to boycott among the socioeconomically disadvantaged is driven by their reduced sense of control, which induces lower beliefs that consumption can be used as an effective instrument to enact change. These findings offer important contributions to the study of boycotting practices and shed new light on the complex relationship between socioeconomic conditions and consumer behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.70021
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stratified consumer activism: How socioeconomic status shapes boycott participation

Debora V. Thompson, Yan Vieites, Daniel Fonseca Fernandes
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

Stratified consumer activism: How socioeconomic status shapes boycott participation

Debora V. Thompson, Yan Vieites, Daniel Fonseca Fernandes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Consumer activism is becoming increasingly common worldwide, but are all consumer groups as likely to engage in these practices? The current research investigates the presence of socioeconomic status (SES) differences in boycotting participation and explores the psychological processes underlying potential discrepancies. Results from four studies, including cross‐national surveys, experiments, and lab‐in‐the‐field evidence, show that low‐SES consumers display a lower likelihood of boycotting companies than their high‐SES peers. The phenomenon emerges across different measures, including self‐reported intentions, past actions, and actual behaviors. This reduced inclination to boycott among the socioeconomically disadvantaged is driven by their reduced sense of control, which induces lower beliefs that consumption can be used as an effective instrument to enact change. These findings offer important contributions to the study of boycotting practices and shed new light on the complex relationship between socioeconomic conditions and consumer behavior.

Journal of Consumer Psychology
Georgetown University (US), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.