Labeling insects as healthy: How Nutri-Score shapes perceived healthiness and acceptance of insect-based foods

As insect-based foods continue to enter mainstream European markets, questions remain regarding the extent to which existing front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labels, such as the Nutri-Score label, retain their effectiveness when applied to these novel and potentially stigmatized products. Against this backdrop, the present research examines whether and how Nutri-Score labeling influences consumer perceptions and acceptance of insect-based foods. Across three experiments involving European consumers (total N = 804), the role of Nutri-Score in shaping perceived healthiness and acceptance was investigated. Study 1 reveals that insect-based products labeled with a Nutri-Score A are perceived as significantly healthier than those labeled with an E. Building on this finding, Study 2 demonstrates that Nutri-Score A enhances consumer acceptance through increased perceived healthiness. Study 3 further examines the moderating role of individual differences. Disgust toward entomophagy was found to weaken the positive impact of Nutri-Score A on perceived healthiness and, in turn, on acceptance. In contrast, health consciousness did not significantly moderate the effects. • Nutri-Score labels shape perceived healthiness of insect-based foods. • Higher Nutri-Score grades increase acceptance of insect-based foods. • Perceived healthiness mediates Nutri-Score effects on acceptance. • Disgust toward entomophagy weakens Nutri-Score's positive impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.105912
Primary Topic
Insect Utilization and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labeling insects as healthy: How Nutri-Score shapes perceived healthiness and acceptance of insect-based foods

Jaewoo Park, Yanzhe Yuan, Zining Wang, Mai Nguyen
Food Quality and Preference
Insect Utilization and Effects
article

Labeling insects as healthy: How Nutri-Score shapes perceived healthiness and acceptance of insect-based foods

Jaewoo Park, Yanzhe Yuan, Zining Wang, Mai Nguyen
article en

Abstract

As insect-based foods continue to enter mainstream European markets, questions remain regarding the extent to which existing front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labels, such as the Nutri-Score label, retain their effectiveness when applied to these novel and potentially stigmatized products. Against this backdrop, the present research examines whether and how Nutri-Score labeling influences consumer perceptions and acceptance of insect-based foods. Across three experiments involving European consumers (total N = 804), the role of Nutri-Score in shaping perceived healthiness and acceptance was investigated. Study 1 reveals that insect-based products labeled with a Nutri-Score A are perceived as significantly healthier than those labeled with an E. Building on this finding, Study 2 demonstrates that Nutri-Score A enhances consumer acceptance through increased perceived healthiness. Study 3 further examines the moderating role of individual differences. Disgust toward entomophagy was found to weaken the positive impact of Nutri-Score A on perceived healthiness and, in turn, on acceptance. In contrast, health consciousness did not significantly moderate the effects. • Nutri-Score labels shape perceived healthiness of insect-based foods. • Higher Nutri-Score grades increase acceptance of insect-based foods. • Perceived healthiness mediates Nutri-Score effects on acceptance. • Disgust toward entomophagy weakens Nutri-Score's positive impact.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 142
Griffith University (AU), Hanoi University of Industry (VN), Tokyo International University (JP), Chuo University (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Insect Utilization and Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.