Who gets to the top? Children’s and young adults’ thinking about career hierarchies and their future career attainment

This study examined the development of abstract reasoning about career hierarchies. With age, U.S. children (N = 300; 5-10 years, 50% girls, 80% White; collected February 2019 to June 2020), like young adults (N = 350; 18-25, 56% women, 23% White; July 2021 to August 2021), indicated higher-level positions are harder to obtain, bestow more money and happiness, and have workers who are smarter but less nice and hardworking. Children reported upward (versus downward) mobility is harder to achieve and aspired toward higher-level positions than they expected to attain. Yet, boys increasingly aspired toward higher-level positions than girls, especially when high-level positions were numerically rare. These findings reveal early abstract reasoning about career hierarchies and the emergence of gender gaps in vertical career aspirations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf044
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who gets to the top? Children’s and young adults’ thinking about career hierarchies and their future career attainment

Reut Shachnai, Rachel Ann King, Katherine D. Kinzler, Isobel Azani Heck
Child Development
Career Development and Diversity
article

Who gets to the top? Children’s and young adults’ thinking about career hierarchies and their future career attainment

Reut Shachnai, Rachel Ann King, Katherine D. Kinzler, Isobel Azani Heck
article en

Abstract

This study examined the development of abstract reasoning about career hierarchies. With age, U.S. children (N = 300; 5-10 years, 50% girls, 80% White; collected February 2019 to June 2020), like young adults (N = 350; 18-25, 56% women, 23% White; July 2021 to August 2021), indicated higher-level positions are harder to obtain, bestow more money and happiness, and have workers who are smarter but less nice and hardworking. Children reported upward (versus downward) mobility is harder to achieve and aspired toward higher-level positions than they expected to attain. Yet, boys increasingly aspired toward higher-level positions than girls, especially when high-level positions were numerically rare. These findings reveal early abstract reasoning about career hierarchies and the emergence of gender gaps in vertical career aspirations.

Child Development
Yale University (US), University of Chicago (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US), University of Rochester (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.