Real-world effectiveness of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Background Effectiveness classification of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS relies either on head-to-head trials or indirect comparisons of annualized relapse rates (ARR) across studies. Validating efficacy estimates in real-world settings is crucial, particularly as the discussion on the broader use of high-efficacy (HE) DMTs including antibodies, S1P receptor modulators, and cladribine tablets, continues to evolve. Because treatment decisions in clinical practice are individualized and no single DMT is universally preferred, effectiveness assessments are appropriately conducted at the group level. Objective To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of HE vs. low-efficacy (LE) DMTs at the group level. Methods A retrospective 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using routine data from MS patients initiating HE or LE DMTs at a German tertiary MS center between 2007 and 2023. Primary outcome was ARR; secondary endpoints were cumulative hazard of relapse, MRI activity, loss of NEDA-3, 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP), and treatment discontinuation. Results After matching, 266 datasets were analyzed with a median follow-up of 24 months in the LE DMT group and 43 months in the HE DMT group. ARR was 64% lower with HE DMTs (0.13 vs. 0.37; rate ratio 0.36, 95% –CI: 0.23–0.53; p < 0.001). Relapse hazard, MRI activity, and NEDA-3 loss were 53–63% lower (hazard ratios 0.41, 0.37, and 0.47; all p < 0.001). CDP did not differ between groups. Hazard of treatment discontinuation was 67–87% lower with HE DMTs (hazard ratios 0.13–0.33; all p < 0.001). No discontinuation due to recurrent infections occurred. Conclusion HE DMTs resulted in significantly lower clinical and radiological disease activity than LE DMTs in real-world conditions while showing greater treatment persistence. These findings support the broad use of HE DMTs, while LE DMTs may be reserved for specific indications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1773074
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world effectiveness of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Michelle Dreiling, Florian Rakers, Tatjana Beppler, A. Scherag et al.
Frontiers in Neurology
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Real-world effectiveness of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Michelle Dreiling, Florian Rakers, Tatjana Beppler, A. Scherag, Jasmin Wich, Matthias Schwab
article en

Abstract

Background Effectiveness classification of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS relies either on head-to-head trials or indirect comparisons of annualized relapse rates (ARR) across studies. Validating efficacy estimates in real-world settings is crucial, particularly as the discussion on the broader use of high-efficacy (HE) DMTs including antibodies, S1P receptor modulators, and cladribine tablets, continues to evolve. Because treatment decisions in clinical practice are individualized and no single DMT is universally preferred, effectiveness assessments are appropriately conducted at the group level. Objective To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of HE vs. low-efficacy (LE) DMTs at the group level. Methods A retrospective 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using routine data from MS patients initiating HE or LE DMTs at a German tertiary MS center between 2007 and 2023. Primary outcome was ARR; secondary endpoints were cumulative hazard of relapse, MRI activity, loss of NEDA-3, 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP), and treatment discontinuation. Results After matching, 266 datasets were analyzed with a median follow-up of 24 months in the LE DMT group and 43 months in the HE DMT group. ARR was 64% lower with HE DMTs (0.13 vs. 0.37; rate ratio 0.36, 95% –CI: 0.23–0.53; p < 0.001). Relapse hazard, MRI activity, and NEDA-3 loss were 53–63% lower (hazard ratios 0.41, 0.37, and 0.47; all p < 0.001). CDP did not differ between groups. Hazard of treatment discontinuation was 67–87% lower with HE DMTs (hazard ratios 0.13–0.33; all p < 0.001). No discontinuation due to recurrent infections occurred. Conclusion HE DMTs resulted in significantly lower clinical and radiological disease activity than LE DMTs in real-world conditions while showing greater treatment persistence. These findings support the broad use of HE DMTs, while LE DMTs may be reserved for specific indications.

Frontiers in NeurologyVol. 17
Jena University Hospital (DE)
Novartis Pharma
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.