Novel reject and effective dose analysis in digital radiography—a Finnish imaging department study

Reject rate analysis focuses traditionally on frequency rather than radiation impact, thus limiting its alignment with radiation protection goals. This study examined reject rates by body part in digital radiography at a Finnish imaging department and introduced an evaluation of their relative contribution to patients' additional radiation exposure by calculating a median effective dose-weighted reject rate. The resulting metric may serve as a practical tool to support optimization of radiation burden. The pelvic region and lumbar spine rejected radiographs contributed the highest additional radiation dose, followed by the chest, where the high examination volume outweighed the low relative rejection rate in population-wide dose impact. Extremities contributed negligibly to additional effective dose irrespective of their reject rates, primarily due to a substantially lower radiation sensitivity. These findings emphasize the value of integrating effective dose metrics into reject analysis to better reflect patient risk and enhance quality assurance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf124
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel reject and effective dose analysis in digital radiography—a Finnish imaging department study

Lauri Koivula, A. Pekkarinen, Anne-Mari Vitikainen, Juha Peltonen et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Novel reject and effective dose analysis in digital radiography—a Finnish imaging department study

Lauri Koivula, A. Pekkarinen, Anne-Mari Vitikainen, Juha Peltonen, Arthur Sinimyrsky, Johannes Ahlnäs
article en

Abstract

Reject rate analysis focuses traditionally on frequency rather than radiation impact, thus limiting its alignment with radiation protection goals. This study examined reject rates by body part in digital radiography at a Finnish imaging department and introduced an evaluation of their relative contribution to patients' additional radiation exposure by calculating a median effective dose-weighted reject rate. The resulting metric may serve as a practical tool to support optimization of radiation burden. The pelvic region and lumbar spine rejected radiographs contributed the highest additional radiation dose, followed by the chest, where the high examination volume outweighed the low relative rejection rate in population-wide dose impact. Extremities contributed negligibly to additional effective dose irrespective of their reject rates, primarily due to a substantially lower radiation sensitivity. These findings emphasize the value of integrating effective dose metrics into reject analysis to better reflect patient risk and enhance quality assurance.

Radiation Protection DosimetryVol. 202(3–4)
University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Kotka Maritime Research Centre (FI)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Novel reject and effective dose analysis in digital radiography—a Finnish imaging department study — Lauri Koivula, A. Pekkarinen, et al. · Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS