A personalized prognostic model based on preoperative body composition and nutritional parameters for gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The long-term survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains suboptimal. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 403 NAC-LAGC patients followed by radical gastrectomy between January 2016 and December 2023. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Variables with a univariable P value below 0.20 were first identified, and LASSO regression together with stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression was then applied to screen the candidate predictors (p < 0.10). This process yielded the final set of predictive factors based on multidimensional indicators related to nutritional status and body composition. Using the training set, we constructed separate nomograms for predicting overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease-free survival, and then developed a corresponding risk stratification model. Model performance was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and was further examined in the validation set. Through feature selection, we identified several independent prognostic predictors. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses confirmed that each variable was significantly associated with poor prognosis (p < 0.01). Based on these predictors, we first constructed individual nomograms to predict OS, PFS, and DFS, all of which achieved favorable discriminative performance with AUC values exceeding 0.800. To further enhance risk stratification, we subsequently developed a comprehensive prognostic risk stratification model (PRSM). The PRSM demonstrated robust and reliable predictive ability: in the training cohort, all AUCs were above 0.800 (p < 0.001), with a c-index of 0.836; in the validation cohort, AUCs similarly exceeded 0.800 (p < 0.001), with a c-index of 0.829. Decision curve analysis further indicated that, within an appropriate threshold range, the PRSM provided meaningful clinical net benefit for NAC-LAGC patients. In conclusion, we developed and validated PRSM that incorporates multidimensional predictors reflecting nutritional status and body composition to estimate long-term outcomes in NAC-LAGC patients. The model provides reliable risk stratification and may serve as a practical tool to support individualized nutritional optimization and postoperative management in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1759292
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A personalized prognostic model based on preoperative body composition and nutritional parameters for gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

S. Liu, Zongsheng Sun, Zhengzhao Wang, Rong Liu et al.
Frontiers in Immunology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

A personalized prognostic model based on preoperative body composition and nutritional parameters for gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

S. Liu, Zongsheng Sun, Zhengzhao Wang, Rong Liu, Mingyu Yang, Shanglong Liu, Yuandi Wang, Xuesen Li, Hanhui Jing, Dongsheng Wang
article en

Abstract

The long-term survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains suboptimal. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 403 NAC-LAGC patients followed by radical gastrectomy between January 2016 and December 2023. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Variables with a univariable P value below 0.20 were first identified, and LASSO regression together with stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression was then applied to screen the candidate predictors (p < 0.10). This process yielded the final set of predictive factors based on multidimensional indicators related to nutritional status and body composition. Using the training set, we constructed separate nomograms for predicting overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease-free survival, and then developed a corresponding risk stratification model. Model performance was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and was further examined in the validation set. Through feature selection, we identified several independent prognostic predictors. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses confirmed that each variable was significantly associated with poor prognosis (p < 0.01). Based on these predictors, we first constructed individual nomograms to predict OS, PFS, and DFS, all of which achieved favorable discriminative performance with AUC values exceeding 0.800. To further enhance risk stratification, we subsequently developed a comprehensive prognostic risk stratification model (PRSM). The PRSM demonstrated robust and reliable predictive ability: in the training cohort, all AUCs were above 0.800 (p < 0.001), with a c-index of 0.836; in the validation cohort, AUCs similarly exceeded 0.800 (p < 0.001), with a c-index of 0.829. Decision curve analysis further indicated that, within an appropriate threshold range, the PRSM provided meaningful clinical net benefit for NAC-LAGC patients. In conclusion, we developed and validated PRSM that incorporates multidimensional predictors reflecting nutritional status and body composition to estimate long-term outcomes in NAC-LAGC patients. The model provides reliable risk stratification and may serve as a practical tool to support individualized nutritional optimization and postoperative management in clinical practice.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
Qingdao University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.