Myocardial Viability and Ischaemia in Chronic Total Occlusion

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Chronic total occlusion (CTO) affects 30% of patients undergoing coronary angiography rendering poorer outcomes. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be technically successful, RCTs show no survival benefit. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) provides comprehensive myocardial phenotyping, offering prognostic insights in this high-risk cohort. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Fifty-six patients with angiographically confirmed CTO underwent stress perfusion CMR with late gadolinium enhancement. Myocardial function, ischaemia and scar burden were quantified and compared across CTO territory and viability subgroups. <i>Results</i>: In patients with CTO, 27% of patients (15/56) had no viability. In patients with viable myocardium, 66% (27/41) demonstrated reversible ischaemia. Viable myocardium was associated with significantly higher LV stroke volumes (93.6 ± 20.1 mL vs. 80.9 ± 18.4 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.039), along with lower LV scar mass (18.7 ± 13.5g vs. 32.3 ± 12.8g; <i>p</i> = 0.002) and scar percentage (14.9 ± 8.3% vs. 25.9 ± 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Viable myocardium showed more ischaemia both globally (11.6 ± 14.3g vs. 0.2 ± 9.3g; <i>p</i> = 0.005) and within the CTO territory (10.3 ± 10.3% vs. 2.3 ± 2.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Non-viable myocardium was associated with significantly higher CTO-territory scar mass (9.4 ± 6.5 g vs. 5.1 ± 6.9 g; <i>p</i> = 0.046) and scar percentage (21.8 ± 13.3% vs. 11.7 ± 12.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.01), indicating extensive fibrosis. A scar burden threshold of 11.18% in CTO territory predicted non-viability with 80% sensitivity and 65.85% specificity (AUC = 0.701 [95% CI 0.54-0.87], <i>p</i> = 0.019). <i>Conclusions</i><b>:</b> Among CTO patients, 27% harbour no viability, while patients with viable myocardium typically exhibit reversible ischaemia-representing a phenotype with preserved viability and inducible ischaemia. These findings support the use of multiparametric CMR to phenotype CTO territories prior to considering CTO-PCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030540
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Myocardial Viability and Ischaemia in Chronic Total Occlusion

Simon Eccleshall, Hosamadin Assadi, Timothy J Gilbert, Clint Maart et al.
Medicina
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Myocardial Viability and Ischaemia in Chronic Total Occlusion

Simon Eccleshall, Hosamadin Assadi, Timothy J Gilbert, Clint Maart, Zia Mehmood, Bahman Kasmai, Kurian Thampi, Alisdair Ryding, Chris Sawh, Sunil Nair, Rob J. van der Geest, Vassilios S. Vassiliou, Rui Li, Gareth Matthews, Preethi Suresh, Pankaj Garg
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Chronic total occlusion (CTO) affects 30% of patients undergoing coronary angiography rendering poorer outcomes. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be technically successful, RCTs show no survival benefit. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) provides comprehensive myocardial phenotyping, offering prognostic insights in this high-risk cohort. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Fifty-six patients with angiographically confirmed CTO underwent stress perfusion CMR with late gadolinium enhancement. Myocardial function, ischaemia and scar burden were quantified and compared across CTO territory and viability subgroups. <i>Results</i>: In patients with CTO, 27% of patients (15/56) had no viability. In patients with viable myocardium, 66% (27/41) demonstrated reversible ischaemia. Viable myocardium was associated with significantly higher LV stroke volumes (93.6 ± 20.1 mL vs. 80.9 ± 18.4 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.039), along with lower LV scar mass (18.7 ± 13.5g vs. 32.3 ± 12.8g; <i>p</i> = 0.002) and scar percentage (14.9 ± 8.3% vs. 25.9 ± 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Viable myocardium showed more ischaemia both globally (11.6 ± 14.3g vs. 0.2 ± 9.3g; <i>p</i> = 0.005) and within the CTO territory (10.3 ± 10.3% vs. 2.3 ± 2.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Non-viable myocardium was associated with significantly higher CTO-territory scar mass (9.4 ± 6.5 g vs. 5.1 ± 6.9 g; <i>p</i> = 0.046) and scar percentage (21.8 ± 13.3% vs. 11.7 ± 12.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.01), indicating extensive fibrosis. A scar burden threshold of 11.18% in CTO territory predicted non-viability with 80% sensitivity and 65.85% specificity (AUC = 0.701 [95% CI 0.54-0.87], <i>p</i> = 0.019). <i>Conclusions</i><b>:</b> Among CTO patients, 27% harbour no viability, while patients with viable myocardium typically exhibit reversible ischaemia-representing a phenotype with preserved viability and inducible ischaemia. These findings support the use of multiparametric CMR to phenotype CTO territories prior to considering CTO-PCI.

MedicinaVol. 62(3)
University of East Anglia (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.