Sweep Gas Nitric Oxide During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Neonates and Children (NECTAR Trial): A Single-Center, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives: To test the feasibility and safety of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) delivering nitric oxide into the sweep gas of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuits (sNO) in critically ill children. Second, we explored whether use of sNO may influence clinical outcomes. Design: Prospective pilot single-center open-label RCT (trial registration number ACTRN12619001518156). Setting: Single-center, tertiary PICU with enrollment between July 2020 and July 2023. Patients: Patients from birth to 16 years requiring venoarterial or venovenous ECMO support were enrolled. Interventions: Randomization to sweep flow with an oxygen/nitrogen mix vs. a mix of oxygen, nitrogen and sNO (20 parts per milliion). Randomization was stratified by type of ECMO support (venoarterial vs. venovenous). Measurements and Main Results: Of 60 eligible patients 53 underwent randomization. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) was 1 month (0.1–33.5 mo) and 6.2 months (0.5–120.2 mo) for the intervention and control arms, respectively. Venoarterial and venovenous support were used in 35 of 53 (65%) and 18 of 53 (35%) patients, respectively. In all, 17 of 53 (32%) received pulmonary, 23 of 53 (43%) cardiac and 13 of 53 (25%) extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation support. Median (IQR) survival free of ECMO and survival free of PICU censored at 30 and 90 days were similar: 18.2 days (0–25.2 d) and 69.1 days (0–85.2 d) vs. 20.8 days (0–26.3 d) and 77.7 days (0–85.9 d) with an effect estimate of –3.2 days (–16.6 to 10.1 d) and –8.8 days (–54.2 to 36.6 d) between the intervention and standard care arm. Blood product use, circuit duration to replacement, free plasma hemoglobin, degree of oxygenator thrombus, and incidence of methemoglobinemia were similar between the two groups. No major adverse events occurred related to the treatment allocation or intervention. Conclusions: This single-center pilot RCT of sNO vs. standard sweep flow in the ECMO circuit demonstrated that such a trial is safe and feasible. However, given no effect of sNO on clinical outcomes was detected further exploration of dose and route of administration of NO should be undertaken before larger, definitive trials are conducted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292904
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sweep Gas Nitric Oxide During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Neonates and Children (NECTAR Trial): A Single-Center, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Prem Venugopal, Adrian Mattke, Nelson Alphonso, KRISTEN S. GIBBONS et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Sweep Gas Nitric Oxide During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Neonates and Children (NECTAR Trial): A Single-Center, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Prem Venugopal, Adrian Mattke, Nelson Alphonso, KRISTEN S. GIBBONS, Antje Blumenthal, Renate Le Marsney, Christopher O’Brien, Debbie A Long, Luregn Schlapbach, Kerry Johnson
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To test the feasibility and safety of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) delivering nitric oxide into the sweep gas of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuits (sNO) in critically ill children. Second, we explored whether use of sNO may influence clinical outcomes. Design: Prospective pilot single-center open-label RCT (trial registration number ACTRN12619001518156). Setting: Single-center, tertiary PICU with enrollment between July 2020 and July 2023. Patients: Patients from birth to 16 years requiring venoarterial or venovenous ECMO support were enrolled. Interventions: Randomization to sweep flow with an oxygen/nitrogen mix vs. a mix of oxygen, nitrogen and sNO (20 parts per milliion). Randomization was stratified by type of ECMO support (venoarterial vs. venovenous). Measurements and Main Results: Of 60 eligible patients 53 underwent randomization. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) was 1 month (0.1–33.5 mo) and 6.2 months (0.5–120.2 mo) for the intervention and control arms, respectively. Venoarterial and venovenous support were used in 35 of 53 (65%) and 18 of 53 (35%) patients, respectively. In all, 17 of 53 (32%) received pulmonary, 23 of 53 (43%) cardiac and 13 of 53 (25%) extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation support. Median (IQR) survival free of ECMO and survival free of PICU censored at 30 and 90 days were similar: 18.2 days (0–25.2 d) and 69.1 days (0–85.2 d) vs. 20.8 days (0–26.3 d) and 77.7 days (0–85.9 d) with an effect estimate of –3.2 days (–16.6 to 10.1 d) and –8.8 days (–54.2 to 36.6 d) between the intervention and standard care arm. Blood product use, circuit duration to replacement, free plasma hemoglobin, degree of oxygenator thrombus, and incidence of methemoglobinemia were similar between the two groups. No major adverse events occurred related to the treatment allocation or intervention. Conclusions: This single-center pilot RCT of sNO vs. standard sweep flow in the ECMO circuit demonstrated that such a trial is safe and feasible. However, given no effect of sNO on clinical outcomes was detected further exploration of dose and route of administration of NO should be undertaken before larger, definitive trials are conducted.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.