Thermodynamic Modeling of Hydrogen Fuel Reformers Through Gibbs Energy Minimization

ABSTRACT In this study, a framework for a hydrogen reformer is developed. The equilibrium compositions are predicted by using Gibbs free‐energy minimization. In this context, six separate scenarios are developed for various reformer models in order to investigate the influence of different design parameters on hydrogen production and reformer performance. It is found that, for diesel, adiabatic steam reforming yields outlet temperatures ranging from 973 to 1273 K at pressures between 500 and 1500 kPa, with the highest hydrogen yield achieved at a steam‐to‐carbon ratio of 3.5. Isothermal steam reformers can achieve hydrogen production levels of 70%–80% at temperatures exceeding 1000 K. In the process of partial oxidation, temperatures exceeding 1200 K lead to a notable shift in gas composition, reducing CO from approximately 81% to 68% and increasing CH 4 from around 18% to 32% as the O/C ratio and pressure increase. In contrast, autothermal reformers (ATRs) provide compositions that remain independent of pressure. As the framework is equilibrium‐based, the reported compositions and parametric sensitivities represent thermodynamic upper‐bound trends rather than predictive behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel Cells
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.70071
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermodynamic Modeling of Hydrogen Fuel Reformers Through Gibbs Energy Minimization

Mert Sinan TURGUT, Mustafa Turhan Çoban, Mustafa Asker, Oğuz Emrah Turgut et al.
Fuel Cells
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

Thermodynamic Modeling of Hydrogen Fuel Reformers Through Gibbs Energy Minimization

Mert Sinan TURGUT, Mustafa Turhan Çoban, Mustafa Asker, Oğuz Emrah Turgut, Hadi Genceli
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, a framework for a hydrogen reformer is developed. The equilibrium compositions are predicted by using Gibbs free‐energy minimization. In this context, six separate scenarios are developed for various reformer models in order to investigate the influence of different design parameters on hydrogen production and reformer performance. It is found that, for diesel, adiabatic steam reforming yields outlet temperatures ranging from 973 to 1273 K at pressures between 500 and 1500 kPa, with the highest hydrogen yield achieved at a steam‐to‐carbon ratio of 3.5. Isothermal steam reformers can achieve hydrogen production levels of 70%–80% at temperatures exceeding 1000 K. In the process of partial oxidation, temperatures exceeding 1200 K lead to a notable shift in gas composition, reducing CO from approximately 81% to 68% and increasing CH 4 from around 18% to 32% as the O/C ratio and pressure increase. In contrast, autothermal reformers (ATRs) provide compositions that remain independent of pressure. As the framework is equilibrium‐based, the reported compositions and parametric sensitivities represent thermodynamic upper‐bound trends rather than predictive behavior.

Fuel CellsVol. 26(2)
Piri Reis University (TR), Izmir University (TR), Istanbul Technical University (TR), Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.