Comparative Analysis of Wind Load Application Techniques for Aeroelastic Analysis of Hard Wingsails

Abstract Reliability analysis of mechanical systems requires precise evaluation of structural responses in critical components. In aeroelastic analysis, the fidelity of these responses depends on accurate modeling and transfer of aerodynamic loads between fluid solvers and structural solvers. Although several CFD-to-FE load transfer methods exist, comparative assessments for wingsail structures remain limited. This study investigates the aeroelastic response of hard wingsail components using three aerodynamic load transfer methods, assessing both structural response predictions and computational time. The first method uses a Lifting-line method, transferring aerodynamic loads directly to the lifting-line. The second is a panel-based method based on the 3D vortex lattice model, integrating CFD and structural mechanics via the DLOAD subroutine in Abaqus v2023. The third is similar but uses a field-mapping technique for load transfer. These methods are evaluated for single-element and two-element wingsails. Aerodynamic pressure coefficients for the single-element configuration are obtained using XFOIL 6.99; experimental data inform the two-element wingsail. Results indicate that the lifting-line method predicts higher von Mises stress in the root region of the main load-bearing steel component, but lower stresses in the core and face-sheet regions of the leading-edge sandwich composite. Structural stresses in the root regions of the leading edge and spar-box components of the wingsail obtained using the DLOAD subroutine strongly agree with the mapped field method. However, the DLOAD subroutine demonstrates superior computational speed, requiring approximately 30% less wall-clock time than the mapped field method at higher core counts, while maintaining nearly equivalent deformation predictions. Keywords wingsail; lifting-line method; vortex lattice method; field mapping; DLOAD subroutine; finite element analysis; wind-assisted propulsion

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sailing Technology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5957/jst/2026.11.1.95
Primary Topic
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Wind Load Application Techniques for Aeroelastic Analysis of Hard Wingsails

Kris Hectors, Mekete Mulualem Mebratu, Wim De Waele
Journal of Sailing Technology
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
article

Comparative Analysis of Wind Load Application Techniques for Aeroelastic Analysis of Hard Wingsails

Kris Hectors, Mekete Mulualem Mebratu, Wim De Waele
article en

Abstract

Abstract Reliability analysis of mechanical systems requires precise evaluation of structural responses in critical components. In aeroelastic analysis, the fidelity of these responses depends on accurate modeling and transfer of aerodynamic loads between fluid solvers and structural solvers. Although several CFD-to-FE load transfer methods exist, comparative assessments for wingsail structures remain limited. This study investigates the aeroelastic response of hard wingsail components using three aerodynamic load transfer methods, assessing both structural response predictions and computational time. The first method uses a Lifting-line method, transferring aerodynamic loads directly to the lifting-line. The second is a panel-based method based on the 3D vortex lattice model, integrating CFD and structural mechanics via the DLOAD subroutine in Abaqus v2023. The third is similar but uses a field-mapping technique for load transfer. These methods are evaluated for single-element and two-element wingsails. Aerodynamic pressure coefficients for the single-element configuration are obtained using XFOIL 6.99; experimental data inform the two-element wingsail. Results indicate that the lifting-line method predicts higher von Mises stress in the root region of the main load-bearing steel component, but lower stresses in the core and face-sheet regions of the leading-edge sandwich composite. Structural stresses in the root regions of the leading edge and spar-box components of the wingsail obtained using the DLOAD subroutine strongly agree with the mapped field method. However, the DLOAD subroutine demonstrates superior computational speed, requiring approximately 30% less wall-clock time than the mapped field method at higher core counts, while maintaining nearly equivalent deformation predictions. Keywords wingsail; lifting-line method; vortex lattice method; field mapping; DLOAD subroutine; finite element analysis; wind-assisted propulsion

Journal of Sailing TechnologyVol. 11(01)
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.