Nonlinear Response‐History Analyses of Masonry and Mixed Structures With HybriDFEM

ABSTRACT The hybrid discrete‐finite element (HybriDFEM) method, previously developed to perform static and modal analysis in discrete and coupled discrete‐finite element models, is extended to nonlinear response‐history analyses. The equations of motion for the HybriDFEM model are solved through various numerical time‐integration schemes, both explicit and implicit, and considering different damping models. Specific examples are presented to assess the effectiveness of the implementation. First, a stability and accuracy analysis is performed on an undamped elastic beam undergoing free vibrations to investigate period elongation with respect to the time step. Next, the dynamic response of a masonry column and masonry arch subjected to impulse loads is evaluated, exploring the performance of HybriDFEM in problems involving rocking, curved geometries, large deformations, and damping. It is shown, by comparison with other discrete element models, that both rocking and full collapse can be captured with fidelity by HybriDFEM, and that implicit schemes can reduce the computational demand with respect to explicit ones without affecting solution accuracy. Although the use of viscous Rayleigh damping defined at the global level is commonly implemented in FEM, key issues related to its use in DEM are raised and explained in this paper, namely the occurrence of mechanisms during the analysis, which can nullify damping forces when tangent stiffness‐proportional damping is employed. In the final example, a response analysis is conducted on a numerical mock‐up representative of a mixed reinforced concrete‐masonry building subjected to ground motion. It demonstrates how complex interactions between structural elements can be captured with realistic simulation timeframes by coupling rigid‐block HybriDFEM representations, for the masonry walls, with standard beam elements, for the reinforced concrete beams and columns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70127
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonlinear Response‐History Analyses of Masonry and Mixed Structures With HybriDFEM

Igor Bouckaert, Michele Godio, Joao Pacheco de Almeida
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Nonlinear Response‐History Analyses of Masonry and Mixed Structures With HybriDFEM

Igor Bouckaert, Michele Godio, Joao Pacheco de Almeida
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The hybrid discrete‐finite element (HybriDFEM) method, previously developed to perform static and modal analysis in discrete and coupled discrete‐finite element models, is extended to nonlinear response‐history analyses. The equations of motion for the HybriDFEM model are solved through various numerical time‐integration schemes, both explicit and implicit, and considering different damping models. Specific examples are presented to assess the effectiveness of the implementation. First, a stability and accuracy analysis is performed on an undamped elastic beam undergoing free vibrations to investigate period elongation with respect to the time step. Next, the dynamic response of a masonry column and masonry arch subjected to impulse loads is evaluated, exploring the performance of HybriDFEM in problems involving rocking, curved geometries, large deformations, and damping. It is shown, by comparison with other discrete element models, that both rocking and full collapse can be captured with fidelity by HybriDFEM, and that implicit schemes can reduce the computational demand with respect to explicit ones without affecting solution accuracy. Although the use of viscous Rayleigh damping defined at the global level is commonly implemented in FEM, key issues related to its use in DEM are raised and explained in this paper, namely the occurrence of mechanisms during the analysis, which can nullify damping forces when tangent stiffness‐proportional damping is employed. In the final example, a response analysis is conducted on a numerical mock‐up representative of a mixed reinforced concrete‐masonry building subjected to ground motion. It demonstrates how complex interactions between structural elements can be captured with realistic simulation timeframes by coupling rigid‐block HybriDFEM representations, for the masonry walls, with standard beam elements, for the reinforced concrete beams and columns.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), UCLouvain (BE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.