Fractures at virtually all sites are associated with adverse outcomes: an observational study

The FRAX model defines fractures occurring at the hip, vertebrae, humerus, and forearm as major osteoporotic fractures (MOF), leading to the misconception that fractures at other sites (NonMOF) are unimportant. We aimed to compare MOF and NonMOF to 1) assess their contribution to subsequent fracture and mortality risks and 2) the differences in subsequent fracture and mortality risks between MOF and NonMOF as well as 3) assess these contributions using an anatomical classification of hip, vertebral, proximal and distal fractures. Data from 7568 women and 3366 men aged 60+ were utilised from two Longitudinal cohorts (the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study and Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study) to assess subsequent fracture and mortality following initial fractures. Initial fractures were classified as MOF or NonMOF for aim 1 and 2, and as hip, vertebral, proximal, or distal for aim 3. There were 1998 initial fractures (38% NonMOF) in women and 484 (48% NonMOF) in men. During 9551 person-years (py), women experienced 605 subsequent fractures (38% post-NonMOF) and during 2230 py, men had 97 subsequent fractures (48% post-NonMOF). Following the initial fracture, 556 women died (29% post-NonMOF) over 12065 py and 196 men died (38% post-NonMOF) over 2773 py. NonMOF were associated with 69% higher subsequent fracture risk in women (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.47-1.95) and two-fold in men (2.06; 1.52-2.80), compared to initial fracture, comparable to MOF (women: 1.76; 1.56-1.98 and men: 2.09; 1.53-2.85. NonMOF imparted >30% excess mortality (women: 1.37; 1.16-1.60 and men: 1.33; 1.03-1.72), compared to fracture-free population, lower than MOF (women: 1.75; 1.54-1.99 and men: 2.26; 1.81-2.81) but still substantial. All anatomical fracture sites were associated with subsequent fracture risk, and the risk of mortality increased incrementally from distal to proximal, vertebral and hip. MOF and NonMOF showed comparable risks of subsequent fracture and mortality. All sites are associated with adverse outcomes and should be addressed in clinical care guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjag052
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fractures at virtually all sites are associated with adverse outcomes: an observational study

Christopher S. Kovács, Claudie Berger, Jerilynn C. Prior, Dima A. Alajlouni et al.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Fractures at virtually all sites are associated with adverse outcomes: an observational study

Christopher S. Kovács, Claudie Berger, Jerilynn C. Prior, Dima A. Alajlouni, D HANLEY, Dunia Alarkawi, S. Kaiser, JD Adachi, Thach S. Tran, Lisa Langsetmo, Suzanne N Morin, Robert Josse, David Goltzman, Dana Bliuc, Robert D Blank
article en

Abstract

The FRAX model defines fractures occurring at the hip, vertebrae, humerus, and forearm as major osteoporotic fractures (MOF), leading to the misconception that fractures at other sites (NonMOF) are unimportant. We aimed to compare MOF and NonMOF to 1) assess their contribution to subsequent fracture and mortality risks and 2) the differences in subsequent fracture and mortality risks between MOF and NonMOF as well as 3) assess these contributions using an anatomical classification of hip, vertebral, proximal and distal fractures. Data from 7568 women and 3366 men aged 60+ were utilised from two Longitudinal cohorts (the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study and Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study) to assess subsequent fracture and mortality following initial fractures. Initial fractures were classified as MOF or NonMOF for aim 1 and 2, and as hip, vertebral, proximal, or distal for aim 3. There were 1998 initial fractures (38% NonMOF) in women and 484 (48% NonMOF) in men. During 9551 person-years (py), women experienced 605 subsequent fractures (38% post-NonMOF) and during 2230 py, men had 97 subsequent fractures (48% post-NonMOF). Following the initial fracture, 556 women died (29% post-NonMOF) over 12065 py and 196 men died (38% post-NonMOF) over 2773 py. NonMOF were associated with 69% higher subsequent fracture risk in women (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.47-1.95) and two-fold in men (2.06; 1.52-2.80), compared to initial fracture, comparable to MOF (women: 1.76; 1.56-1.98 and men: 2.09; 1.53-2.85. NonMOF imparted >30% excess mortality (women: 1.37; 1.16-1.60 and men: 1.33; 1.03-1.72), compared to fracture-free population, lower than MOF (women: 1.75; 1.54-1.99 and men: 2.26; 1.81-2.81) but still substantial. All anatomical fracture sites were associated with subsequent fracture risk, and the risk of mortality increased incrementally from distal to proximal, vertebral and hip. MOF and NonMOF showed comparable risks of subsequent fracture and mortality. All sites are associated with adverse outcomes and should be addressed in clinical care guidelines.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
University College of the North (CA), University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Dalhousie University (CA), University of Minnesota (US), Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU), Bangor University (GB), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), UNSW Sydney (AU), British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health (CA), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US), McGill University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.