Validation of the Chinese version of the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires

Objective The current study aimed to validate the Chinese version of Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires (CAQs), developed based on the Contrast Avoidance Model. Method In Study 1, we translated the CAQs into Chinese and modified them after back-translation. We then used two separate Chinese samples ( N = 350 and 309, respectively) to explore and validate the factor structure of both CAQ measures. In Study 2, we used a third sample of Chinese college students ( N = 388) to examine reliability and construct validity. Results The original 3 and 2-factor structures for CAQ-Worry and CAQ-General Emotion, respectively, were replicated with acceptable reliability. Compared to the original version, both subscales had acceptable convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity for GAD symptomatology. Conclusion Validation of the CAQs in Chinese allows for future studies of cultural differences in avoiding emotional contrasts and their relationship with mental health problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1643139
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Chinese version of the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires

Michelle Gayle Newman, Jieting Zhang, Sandra J. Llera, Mingcong Tang et al.
Frontiers in Psychology
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Validation of the Chinese version of the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires

Michelle Gayle Newman, Jieting Zhang, Sandra J. Llera, Mingcong Tang, Haiyu Zhong
article en

Abstract

Objective The current study aimed to validate the Chinese version of Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires (CAQs), developed based on the Contrast Avoidance Model. Method In Study 1, we translated the CAQs into Chinese and modified them after back-translation. We then used two separate Chinese samples ( N = 350 and 309, respectively) to explore and validate the factor structure of both CAQ measures. In Study 2, we used a third sample of Chinese college students ( N = 388) to examine reliability and construct validity. Results The original 3 and 2-factor structures for CAQ-Worry and CAQ-General Emotion, respectively, were replicated with acceptable reliability. Compared to the original version, both subscales had acceptable convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity for GAD symptomatology. Conclusion Validation of the CAQs in Chinese allows for future studies of cultural differences in avoiding emotional contrasts and their relationship with mental health problems.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Boston University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Shenzhen University (CN), Towson University (US)
National Social Science Fund of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.