The Agencies of the European Union: A Glimmer of Hope for Enlargement?

Abstract In recent years, the process of EU enlargement has become increasingly difficult. The longer the process drags on and the less likely accession appears, the more the candidate states are discouraged and the less influential the EU becomes. A different approach to integration must therefore be used. The notion of differentiated integration is increasingly mentioned in this regard. Still, notwithstanding the immense opportunity that decentralised agencies represent for implementing differentiated integration, their potential for maintaining EU influence over the candidate countries has hitherto hardly been systematically assessed. In this article, I present the first comprehensive analysis of the co‐operation between candidate countries and decentralised agencies over the last 20 years. Drawing on a novel dataset, I show that candidate countries' co‐operation with EU agencies is shaped by more than the traditional foreign policy and functionalist logics. It varies across formal and ad hoc forms, reflecting the foreign‐policy sector‐specific priorities of EU institutions and tasks interdependence of EU agencies. Moreover, I show that agency independence can act as a moderator in the responsiveness of EU agencies to EU central institutions preferences. Finally, this article shows that administrative capacity is an important factor in enabling the external differentiated integration of candidate countries in EU agencies. These findings have important implications for the study of external differentiated integration, and they reveal a more fragmented picture of EU external governance than previously recognised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70095
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Agencies of the European Union: A Glimmer of Hope for Enlargement?

Matis Poussardin
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The Agencies of the European Union: A Glimmer of Hope for Enlargement?

Matis Poussardin
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the process of EU enlargement has become increasingly difficult. The longer the process drags on and the less likely accession appears, the more the candidate states are discouraged and the less influential the EU becomes. A different approach to integration must therefore be used. The notion of differentiated integration is increasingly mentioned in this regard. Still, notwithstanding the immense opportunity that decentralised agencies represent for implementing differentiated integration, their potential for maintaining EU influence over the candidate countries has hitherto hardly been systematically assessed. In this article, I present the first comprehensive analysis of the co‐operation between candidate countries and decentralised agencies over the last 20 years. Drawing on a novel dataset, I show that candidate countries' co‐operation with EU agencies is shaped by more than the traditional foreign policy and functionalist logics. It varies across formal and ad hoc forms, reflecting the foreign‐policy sector‐specific priorities of EU institutions and tasks interdependence of EU agencies. Moreover, I show that agency independence can act as a moderator in the responsiveness of EU agencies to EU central institutions preferences. Finally, this article shows that administrative capacity is an important factor in enabling the external differentiated integration of candidate countries in EU agencies. These findings have important implications for the study of external differentiated integration, and they reveal a more fragmented picture of EU external governance than previously recognised.

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
University of Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.