Bleeding prevention with desmopressin for allograft kidney biopsies: a double-blind randomized study

Abstract Background Percutaneous kidney allograft biopsy is essential for evaluating graft dysfunction, but post-procedural bleeding remains the most frequent complication, particularly among recipients with impaired renal function. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used prophylactically to reduce bleeding risk, yet its efficacy in the transplant setting remains uncertain. Methods We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at a quaternary transplant center in Brazil. Adult kidney transplant recipients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73m² undergoing allograft biopsy were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous desmopressin (0.3 μg/kg) or placebo before biopsy. All procedures were ultrasound-guided and performed by experienced nephrologists. The primary endpoint was any biopsy-related bleeding complication. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding (transfusion, embolization, nephrectomy, or death), minor bleeding (macroscopic hematuria, hematoma, hemoglobin drop >20%), and hyponatremia. Results A total of 96 biopsies were randomized (48 per group). Baseline demographics, clinical, and procedural characteristics were well-balanced. Any biopsy-related bleeding complication occurred in 29.1% of procedures overall, without a significant difference between the desmopressin and placebo groups (35.4% vs. 22.9%, p=0.262). One major bleeding event occurred in the desmopressin group (2.1%) and none in the placebo group (p=1.00). Minor bleeding was more frequent with desmopressin-treated patients (35.4% vs. 22.9%, p=0.262) than in placebo, but without statistical significance. In adjusted analyses using penalized logistic regression, desmopressin was not associated with reduced bleeding risk [OR 1.61 (95%CI 0.63–4.20)]. In contrast, surveillance biopsies were independently associated with a markedly higher risk of minor bleeding compared with indication biopsies (adjusted OR 10.2; 95%CI 1.8–68.7). No cases of hyponatremia were documented, and adverse events were rare and balanced across groups. Conclusions In this trial of high-risk kidney transplant recipients, prophylactic desmopressin did not reduce biopsy-related bleeding complications compared with placebo. Routine pre-biopsy administration is not supported when biopsies are performed under optimal technical conditions and patient preparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfag083
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bleeding prevention with desmopressin for allograft kidney biopsies: a double-blind randomized study

Roberto Ceratti Manfro, Amanda Vilaverde Perez, Gabriela Vieira Steckert, Andréa Carla Bauer et al.
Clinical Kidney Journal
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Bleeding prevention with desmopressin for allograft kidney biopsies: a double-blind randomized study

Roberto Ceratti Manfro, Amanda Vilaverde Perez, Gabriela Vieira Steckert, Andréa Carla Bauer, Arthur Gus Manfro, Gabriel Sartori Pacini, Vanderlei Carlos Bertuol, LEONARDO LUIGI ADAMS BACKES, Renata Asnis Schuchmann, Eduarda Taís Schneider
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Percutaneous kidney allograft biopsy is essential for evaluating graft dysfunction, but post-procedural bleeding remains the most frequent complication, particularly among recipients with impaired renal function. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used prophylactically to reduce bleeding risk, yet its efficacy in the transplant setting remains uncertain. Methods We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at a quaternary transplant center in Brazil. Adult kidney transplant recipients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73m² undergoing allograft biopsy were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous desmopressin (0.3 μg/kg) or placebo before biopsy. All procedures were ultrasound-guided and performed by experienced nephrologists. The primary endpoint was any biopsy-related bleeding complication. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding (transfusion, embolization, nephrectomy, or death), minor bleeding (macroscopic hematuria, hematoma, hemoglobin drop >20%), and hyponatremia. Results A total of 96 biopsies were randomized (48 per group). Baseline demographics, clinical, and procedural characteristics were well-balanced. Any biopsy-related bleeding complication occurred in 29.1% of procedures overall, without a significant difference between the desmopressin and placebo groups (35.4% vs. 22.9%, p=0.262). One major bleeding event occurred in the desmopressin group (2.1%) and none in the placebo group (p=1.00). Minor bleeding was more frequent with desmopressin-treated patients (35.4% vs. 22.9%, p=0.262) than in placebo, but without statistical significance. In adjusted analyses using penalized logistic regression, desmopressin was not associated with reduced bleeding risk [OR 1.61 (95%CI 0.63–4.20)]. In contrast, surveillance biopsies were independently associated with a markedly higher risk of minor bleeding compared with indication biopsies (adjusted OR 10.2; 95%CI 1.8–68.7). No cases of hyponatremia were documented, and adverse events were rare and balanced across groups. Conclusions In this trial of high-risk kidney transplant recipients, prophylactic desmopressin did not reduce biopsy-related bleeding complications compared with placebo. Routine pre-biopsy administration is not supported when biopsies are performed under optimal technical conditions and patient preparation.

Clinical Kidney Journal
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.