Partnering with Living Donors in the Development of Long-Term Follow-Up Data Collection Instruments

Patient-centered outcomes are increasingly recognized by the transplant community as a key component to improving knowledge and patient counseling, and long-term outcomes after living kidney or liver donation are not well understood. With efforts underway to follow living donors and donor candidates long term, it is critical that living donors and candidates drive the process of patient-centered data collection. Living donors on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients' Living Donor Steering Committee were engaged to brainstorm and prioritize which data elements should be captured. Committee members identified long-term lab values, difficulty with normal activities, and diagnosis of chronic kidney or liver disease as critical long-term outcomes. Additional high-priority elements included short-term lab values, deaths related to donation, mortality among donors compared to nondonors, hospital readmissions, costs and physical limitations related to donation, and whether a donor would donate again. Finally, living donors wanted to know the risk of organ failure among donors compared to nondonors. This prioritization exercise provided valuable insights from living donors to help determine key themes and discrete data elements that should be prioritized for long-term collection and reporting to living donors and living donor candidates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Transplantation
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248261430491
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partnering with Living Donors in the Development of Long-Term Follow-Up Data Collection Instruments

Heather F. Hunt, Krista L. Lentine, Sophia Jackson, A. Waterman et al.
Progress in Transplantation
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Partnering with Living Donors in the Development of Long-Term Follow-Up Data Collection Instruments

Heather F. Hunt, Krista L. Lentine, Sophia Jackson, A. Waterman, Glenna Frey, Allyson Hart, Katie McKee, Aubrey Sepko, Trysha L. Galloway, Michael Murphy, Matt Harmody, Becky Gustamante, Jill Brown, Kelley Hitchman, Jennifer Roberts, Francis Wheeler, Katie Siegert, Sue Venteicher, McKenzie Hull
article en

Abstract

Patient-centered outcomes are increasingly recognized by the transplant community as a key component to improving knowledge and patient counseling, and long-term outcomes after living kidney or liver donation are not well understood. With efforts underway to follow living donors and donor candidates long term, it is critical that living donors and candidates drive the process of patient-centered data collection. Living donors on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients' Living Donor Steering Committee were engaged to brainstorm and prioritize which data elements should be captured. Committee members identified long-term lab values, difficulty with normal activities, and diagnosis of chronic kidney or liver disease as critical long-term outcomes. Additional high-priority elements included short-term lab values, deaths related to donation, mortality among donors compared to nondonors, hospital readmissions, costs and physical limitations related to donation, and whether a donor would donate again. Finally, living donors wanted to know the risk of organ failure among donors compared to nondonors. This prioritization exercise provided valuable insights from living donors to help determine key themes and discrete data elements that should be prioritized for long-term collection and reporting to living donors and living donor candidates.

Progress in Transplantation
Saint Louis University Hospital (US), Quality Living (US), Methodist Hospital (US), V.I.Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs (RU), Donor Network West (US), Community Living (US), Centre for Chronic Disease Control (IN), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US), Living Systems (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.